Skip to content
Compare Zwolle vs Telstar

Zwolle vs Telstar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zwolle vs Telstar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zwolle Zwolle Home Team
Telstar Telstar Away Team
Zwolle
32.4
L L L W L D L W D D

Last 10 Matches

Telstar
64.4
W W D W L L W L W W

Performance Radar

Zwolle
Telstar

Categories Won

1

Zwolle

1

Draw

13

Telstar

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

60%

6W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.4

24 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

+7

+7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Z. Buurmeester (2 goals)
S. van Duijn (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

80%

4W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
50.8

League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 57.6

60.7

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.06

2.37

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.27

Adjusted Power Rating
32.4

Attack: 40.3, Defense: 20.2, Form: 20.2

64.4

Attack: 77.5, Defense: 59.0, Form: 66.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

6
3

76-90+'

6
Zwolle
Telstar
Zwolle

Power Rating Breakdown

32.4

Overall

Attack 40.3
Defense 20.2
Form 20.2
Consistency 61.3
Telstar

Power Rating Breakdown

64.4

Overall

Attack 77.5
Defense 59.0
Form 66.4
Consistency 43.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

57.6 vs 58.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 33%
Zwolle logo Zwolle
L
AEK Athens (58%)
L
Feyenoord (73%)
L
Fortuna (51%)
W
Heracles (36%)
L
PSV (75%)
D
Excelsior (64%)
L
Go Ahead (66%)
W
NAC (50%)
Telstar logo Telstar
W
Volendam (62%)
W
Heracles (36%)
D
NEC (78%)
W
Sparta (44%)
L
Utrecht (71%)
L
Groningen (53%)
W
PSV (70%)
L
Heerenveen (68%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
AEK Athens H
2 - 3 L
58%
Feyenoord H
0 - 2 L
73%
Fortuna A
2 - 3 L
51%
Heracles H
1 - 0 W
36%
PSV A
1 - 6 L
75%
Excelsior H
2 - 2 D
64%
Go Ahead A
0 - 5 L
66%
NAC H
2 - 1 W
50%
Groningen H
1 - 1 D
53%
Sparta A
1 - 1 D
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Volendam A
2 - 1 W
62%
Heracles H
3 - 0 W
36%
NEC A
1 - 1 D
78%
Sparta H
4 - 1 W
44%
Utrecht A
1 - 4 L
71%
Groningen H
0 - 2 L
53%
PSV H
3 - 1 W
70%
Heerenveen A
0 - 3 L
68%
Fortuna A
4 - 1 W
51%
NAC H
3 - 0 W
50%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.8 vs 60.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Telstar leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Zwolle's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Telstar — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Zwolle, who give up 2.4 goals per match at the other end.

Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zwolle is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Zwolle shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Zwolle can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 32.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: Telstar holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 64.4 against 32.4 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making Telstar a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zwolle

Zwolle

VS
Telstar

Telstar

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Zwolle

2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 24 conceded

Telstar

6W 1D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or