Zwolle vs Telstar Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Zwolle vs Telstar: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Zwolle
Home Team
Telstar
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Zwolle
Draw
Telstar
Statistical Comparison
2W, 3D, 5L
6W, 1D, 3L
12 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
24 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
-12
+7
1 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 6 matches
4W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 76.5, Opponent Quality: 57.6
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 58.3
0W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.06
Actual: 2.1 | Diff: -0.27
Attack: 40.3, Defense: 20.2, Form: 20.2
Attack: 77.5, Defense: 59.0, Form: 66.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Zwolle
Telstar
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (50.8 vs 60.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Telstar leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.1 goals per game compared to Zwolle's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Telstar — 1.4 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Zwolle, who give up 2.4 goals per match at the other end.
Telstar has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Telstar has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Zwolle is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Telstar has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.9 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Telstar is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Zwolle shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Telstar faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Zwolle can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 32.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Telstar. In practical terms, Telstar would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Our opponent-adjusted metrics point overwhelmingly in one direction: Telstar holds a commanding advantage here. The power rating gap — 64.4 against 32.4 — reinforces what the underlying numbers already suggest, making Telstar a strong and justified favorite to win decisively.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Zwolle
Telstar
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Zwolle
2W 3D 5L · 12 goals scored · 24 conceded
Telstar
6W 1D 3L · 21 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams