Skip to content
Compare Zwolle vs Thun

Zwolle vs Thun Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Zwolle vs Thun: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Zwolle Zwolle Home Team
Thun Thun Away Team
Zwolle
33.8
L L W L D L W D D D

Last 10 Matches

Thun
35.7
D L L L L W L L W W

Performance Radar

Zwolle
Thun

Categories Won

2

Zwolle

3

Draw

10

Thun

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-11

-11

-5

-5

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Z. Buurmeester (2 goals)
E. Rastoder (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.8

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 59.3

38.6

League Difficulty: 51.0, Opponent Quality: 52.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.07

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.07

1.48

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
33.8

Attack: 34.3, Defense: 30.8, Form: 20.6

35.7

Attack: 47.3, Defense: 26.6, Form: 26.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
3

16-30'

1

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

3
1

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

3
Zwolle
Thun
Zwolle

Power Rating Breakdown

33.8

Overall

Attack 34.3
Defense 30.8
Form 20.6
Consistency 64.0
Thun

Power Rating Breakdown

35.7

Overall

Attack 47.3
Defense 26.6
Form 26.6
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

80.0 vs 51.0

Opponent Quality

59.3 vs 52.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Zwolle logo Zwolle
L
Feyenoord (67%)
L
Fortuna (56%)
W
Heracles (36%)
L
PSV (81%)
D
Excelsior (59%)
L
Go Ahead (64%)
W
NAC (47%)
D
Groningen (65%)
Thun logo Thun
D
St.Gallen (64%)
L
Young Boys (53%)
L
Sion (73%)
L
Basel (44%)
L
Lugano (58%)
W
Basel (39%)
L
Lugano (58%)
L
Zürich (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Feyenoord H
0 - 2 L
67%
Fortuna A
2 - 3 L
56%
Heracles H
1 - 0 W
36%
PSV A
1 - 6 L
81%
Excelsior H
2 - 2 D
59%
Go Ahead A
0 - 5 L
64%
NAC H
2 - 1 W
47%
Groningen H
1 - 1 D
65%
Sparta A
1 - 1 D
50%
Ajax H
0 - 0 D
68%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
St.Gallen A
1 - 1 D
64%
Young Boys H
3 - 8 L
53%
Sion A
0 - 2 L
73%
Basel A
1 - 3 L
44%
Lugano H
0 - 1 L
58%
Basel H
3 - 1 W
39%
Lugano A
0 - 1 L
58%
Zürich A
1 - 2 L
38%
GC Zürich H
5 - 1 W
40%
Young Boys A
2 - 1 W
54%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Zwolle has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 52.8) compared to Thun (SoS: 38.6). This means Zwolle's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Thun holds the attacking edge with 1.6 goals per match versus Zwolle's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Both defenses are comparable, with Zwolle conceding 2.1 and Thun conceding 2.1 per match.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.4 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by the day's form, tactical adjustments, and perhaps a moment of individual brilliance.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Zwolle

Zwolle

VS
Thun

Thun

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Zwolle

2W 4D 4L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded

Thun

3W 1D 6L · 16 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or