Philadelphia vs Austin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Philadelphia vs Austin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Philadelphia
Home Team
Austin
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Philadelphia
Draw
Austin
Statistical Comparison
4W, 3D, 3L
2W, 2D, 6L
22 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+1
-11
1 / 10 matches
0 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
1W / 4 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.6
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8
0W / 0 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.02
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05
Attack: 74.7, Defense: 30.5, Form: 40.7
Attack: 30.0, Defense: 27.0, Form: 18.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Philadelphia
Austin
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.
Context matters here: Philadelphia's schedule strength (SoS: 51.8) has been notably more demanding than Austin's (SoS: 40.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.
Philadelphia's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with M. Iloski leading the charge (8 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
Defensively, Philadelphia and Austin are evenly matched, allowing 2.1 and 2.1 goals per game respectively.
Philadelphia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Statistical modeling projects 3.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Philadelphia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Austin is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Philadelphia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If Austin can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 19.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Philadelphia. In practical terms, Philadelphia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Philadelphia in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.8, compared to 30.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Major League Soccer (2026-08-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Philadelphia
Austin
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Philadelphia
4W 3D 3L · 22 goals scored · 21 conceded
Austin
2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams