Skip to content
Compare Philadelphia vs Austin

Philadelphia vs Austin Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Philadelphia vs Austin: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Philadelphia Philadelphia Home Team
Austin Austin Away Team
Philadelphia
49.8
D D W W W W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Austin
30.1
D W L L L W L L L D

Performance Radar

Philadelphia
Austin

Categories Won

11

Philadelphia

3

Draw

1

Austin

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

-11

-11

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
90%

9 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
M. Iloski (8 goals)
M. Uzuni (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.8

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.6

40.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 51.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
2.22

Actual: 2.2 | Diff: -0.02

0.95

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
49.8

Attack: 74.7, Defense: 30.5, Form: 40.7

30.1

Attack: 30.0, Defense: 27.0, Form: 18.0

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

1
5

46-60'

1
6

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

4
Philadelphia
Austin
Philadelphia

Power Rating Breakdown

49.8

Overall

Attack 74.7
Defense 30.5
Form 40.7
Consistency 50.5
Austin

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 30.0
Defense 27.0
Form 18.0
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.6 vs 51.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Philadelphia logo Philadelphia
D
Austin (42%)
D
Inter Miami (60%)
W
NYCFC (58%)
W
Atlanta United (44%)
W
Sounders (31%)
W
New York (49%)
L
Inter Miami (65%)
D
Columbus (40%)
Austin logo Austin
D
Philadelphia (52%)
W
Sounders (36%)
L
Dallas (53%)
L
Colorado (54%)
L
Houston (70%)
W
Sounders (31%)
L
St. Louis (72%)
L
Sporting KC (41%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Austin A
1 - 1 D
42%
Inter Miami H
2 - 2 D
60%
NYCFC A
3 - 2 W
58%
Atlanta United H
3 - 2 W
44%
Sounders H
1 - 0 W
31%
New York H
3 - 1 W
49%
Inter Miami A
4 - 6 L
65%
Columbus H
1 - 1 D
40%
Orlando A
3 - 4 L
54%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Philadelphia H
1 - 1 D
52%
Sounders A
2 - 1 W
36%
Dallas H
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado A
0 - 1 L
54%
Houston A
0 - 3 L
70%
Sounders H
3 - 1 W
31%
St. Louis A
0 - 3 L
72%
Sporting KC H
1 - 2 L
41%
San Diego A
0 - 5 L
59%
Minnesota A
2 - 2 D
50%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

Context matters here: Philadelphia's schedule strength (SoS: 51.8) has been notably more demanding than Austin's (SoS: 40.1), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Philadelphia's attack is on another level, averaging 2.2 goals per match with M. Iloski leading the charge (8 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

Defensively, Philadelphia and Austin are evenly matched, allowing 2.1 and 2.1 goals per game respectively.

Philadelphia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Philadelphia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Austin is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Philadelphia faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If Austin can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 19.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Philadelphia. In practical terms, Philadelphia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Philadelphia in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.8, compared to 30.1 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Major League Soccer (2026-08-23). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

VS
Austin

Austin

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Philadelphia

4W 3D 3L · 22 goals scored · 21 conceded

Austin

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or