Skip to content
Compare Port Vale vs Huddersfield

Port Vale vs Huddersfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Port Vale vs Huddersfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Port Vale Port Vale Home Team
Huddersfield Huddersfield Away Team
Port Vale
55.0
W W W L W L L D W D

Last 10 Matches

Huddersfield
49.1
W L L W W L D D D W

Performance Radar

Port Vale
Huddersfield

Categories Won

8

Port Vale

2

Draw

5

Huddersfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

40%

4W, 3D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+7

+7

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Archer (2 goals)
M. Harness (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 18
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

48.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.57

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: -0.07

1.82

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.28

Adjusted Power Rating
55.0

Attack: 49.8, Defense: 73.0, Form: 49.8

49.1

Attack: 68.9, Defense: 36.1, Form: 39.4

Goal Timing Analysis

3

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

5

61-75'

4

76-90+'

2
Port Vale
Huddersfield
Port Vale

Power Rating Breakdown

55.0

Overall

Attack 49.8
Defense 73.0
Form 49.8
Consistency 45.7
Huddersfield

Power Rating Breakdown

49.1

Overall

Attack 68.9
Defense 36.1
Form 39.4
Consistency 50.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

52.7 vs 50.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Port Vale logo Port Vale
W
Murcia (40%)
W
Wigan (52%)
W
Tamworth (48%)
L
Lincoln (61%)
W
Stockport (59%)
L
Plymouth (67%)
L
Cardiff (68%)
D
Wigan (47%)
Huddersfield logo Huddersfield
W
Oldham (35%)
L
Fleetwood (55%)
L
Sheff Utd (58%)
W
Fylde (58%)
W
Wimbledon (41%)
L
Mansfield (52%)
D
Bolton (60%)
D
Cardiff (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Murcia H
1 - 0 W
40%
Wigan A
3 - 1 W
52%
Tamworth H
5 - 0 W
48%
Lincoln H
0 - 2 L
61%
Stockport A
2 - 1 W
59%
Plymouth A
1 - 2 L
67%
Cardiff A
0 - 1 L
68%
Wigan H
0 - 0 D
47%
Peterborough A
3 - 1 W
42%
Barnsley H
0 - 0 D
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oldham H
3 - 1 W
35%
Fleetwood A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sheff Utd A
1 - 3 L
58%
Fylde A
2 - 1 W
58%
Wimbledon A
4 - 0 W
41%
Mansfield H
1 - 4 L
52%
Bolton A
3 - 3 D
60%
Cardiff H
1 - 1 D
63%
Wycombe H
3 - 3 D
44%
L Orient A
2 - 1 W
40%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.6 vs 48.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Huddersfield outperforms Port Vale with 2.1 goals per match to 1.5, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Port Vale — 0.8 goals conceded per game and 4 clean sheets put them well ahead of Huddersfield, who give up 1.9 goals per match at the other end.

Port Vale has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Huddersfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Port Vale is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Port Vale has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Huddersfield has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Port Vale. In practical terms, Port Vale would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Port Vale, with a 5.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Port Vale

Port Vale

VS
Huddersfield

Huddersfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Port Vale

5W 2D 3L · 15 goals scored · 8 conceded

Huddersfield

4W 3D 3L · 21 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or