Skip to content
Compare Portsmouth vs Wycombe

Portsmouth vs Wycombe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Portsmouth vs Wycombe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Portsmouth Portsmouth Home Team
Wycombe Wycombe Away Team
Portsmouth
45.1
L D L W D W L W W W

Last 10 Matches

Wycombe
46.3
W W L W L L D L L W

Performance Radar

Portsmouth
Wycombe

Categories Won

5

Portsmouth

4

Draw

6

Wycombe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Segečić (5 goals)
N. Lowe (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 9
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
42.5

League Difficulty: 57.0, Opponent Quality: 56.2

48.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.25

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.05

1.96

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
45.1

Attack: 40.1, Defense: 49.3, Form: 46.2

46.3

Attack: 65.3, Defense: 35.9, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

6
Portsmouth
Wycombe
Portsmouth

Power Rating Breakdown

45.1

Overall

Attack 40.1
Defense 49.3
Form 46.2
Consistency 45.7
Wycombe

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 65.3
Defense 35.9
Form 39.2
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

57.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

56.2 vs 50.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Portsmouth logo Portsmouth
L
Wycombe (49%)
D
Bristol R (69%)
L
Aldershot (42%)
W
Woking (48%)
D
Birmingham (59%)
W
Stoke (47%)
L
Coventry (72%)
W
Leicester (54%)
Wycombe logo Wycombe
W
Portsmouth (49%)
W
Yeovil (35%)
L
QPR (50%)
W
Rotherham (37%)
L
Lincoln (66%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
D
Huddersfield (54%)
L
Bradford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Wycombe A
1 - 3 L
49%
Bristol R A
1 - 1 D
69%
Aldershot A
0 - 2 L
42%
Woking A
2 - 1 W
48%
Birmingham H
1 - 1 D
59%
Stoke A
3 - 1 W
47%
Coventry A
1 - 5 L
72%
Leicester H
1 - 0 W
54%
Ipswich H
2 - 0 W
64%
Middlesbrough A
1 - 0 W
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portsmouth H
3 - 1 W
49%
Yeovil H
3 - 2 W
35%
QPR A
0 - 1 L
50%
Rotherham H
3 - 2 W
37%
Lincoln A
3 - 4 L
66%
Blackpool H
0 - 1 L
52%
Huddersfield A
3 - 3 D
54%
Bradford H
1 - 2 L
45%
Stockport A
0 - 3 L
59%
Port Vale H
4 - 0 W
53%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 42.5 vs 48.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Wycombe leads the attacking statistics, averaging 2.0 goals per game compared to Portsmouth's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Portsmouth holds the advantage — allowing just 1.4 goals per game against Wycombe's 1.9.

Wycombe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.3 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Portsmouth has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Wycombe's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-25), Wycombe prevailed 3-1 against Portsmouth. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Wycombe secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Portsmouth will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Wycombe will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Portsmouth

Portsmouth

VS
Wycombe

Wycombe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Portsmouth

5W 2D 3L · 13 goals scored · 14 conceded

Wycombe

4W 1D 5L · 20 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or