Skip to content
Compare QOTS vs Montrose

QOTS vs Montrose Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare QOTS vs Montrose: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

QOTS QOTS Home Team
Montrose Montrose Away Team
QOTS
47.5
L L W D D D W D D W

Last 10 Matches

Montrose
39.7
L W W W L D L L L W

Performance Radar

QOTS
Montrose

Categories Won

8

QOTS

2

Draw

5

Montrose

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+3

+3

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Clark (7 goals)
E. Loudon (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4

42.9

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 45.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.66

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14

0.98

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
47.5

Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9

39.7

Attack: 34.1, Defense: 49.5, Form: 37.2

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

5
1

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2
5

61-75'

3
7

76-90+'

QOTS
Montrose
QOTS

Power Rating Breakdown

47.5

Overall

Attack 57.8
Defense 48.2
Form 28.9
Consistency 62.8
Montrose

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 34.1
Defense 49.5
Form 37.2
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 39.0

Opponent Quality

47.4 vs 45.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
QOTS logo QOTS
L
Queen's Park (54%)
L
Aberdeen (60%)
W
Brora Rangers (42%)
D
Kelty Hearts (45%)
D
Stenhousemuir (64%)
D
Stenhousemuir (59%)
W
Alloa Athletic (39%)
D
Montrose (38%)
Montrose logo Montrose
L
Spartans (38%)
W
Arbroath (47%)
W
Stirling (44%)
W
Dundee Utd (48%)
L
Stenhousemuir (47%)
D
QOTS (50%)
L
Hamilton (54%)
L
Kelty Hearts (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Queen's Park A
1 - 3 L
54%
Aberdeen H
1 - 4 L
60%
Brora Rangers A
3 - 0 W
42%
Kelty Hearts H
1 - 1 D
45%
Stenhousemuir A
2 - 2 D
64%
Stenhousemuir H
1 - 1 D
59%
Alloa Athletic A
4 - 1 W
39%
Montrose H
2 - 2 D
38%
Peterhead A
1 - 1 D
37%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 0 W
36%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Spartans H
0 - 2 L
38%
Arbroath A
2 - 0 W
47%
Stirling A
2 - 0 W
44%
Dundee Utd H
1 - 0 W
48%
Stenhousemuir H
0 - 2 L
47%
QOTS A
2 - 2 D
50%
Hamilton H
0 - 2 L
54%
Kelty Hearts A
1 - 3 L
46%
Cove Rangers H
2 - 3 L
36%
East Fife H
1 - 0 W
45%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.4 vs 42.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

QOTS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Montrose's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with QOTS giving up 1.5 and Montrose giving up 1.4 per fixture.

QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Montrose has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Montrose can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 7.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

These two teams drew 2-2 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

QOTS

QOTS

VS
Montrose

Montrose

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

QOTS

3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded

Montrose

4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or