QOTS vs Montrose Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare QOTS vs Montrose: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
QOTS
Home Team
Montrose
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
QOTS
Draw
Montrose
Statistical Comparison
3W, 5D, 2L
4W, 1D, 5L
18 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
14 / 10 matches
+3
-3
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.4
League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 45.5
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.14
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 57.8, Defense: 48.2, Form: 28.9
Attack: 34.1, Defense: 49.5, Form: 37.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
QOTS
Montrose
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.4 vs 42.9), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
QOTS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Montrose's 1.1 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with QOTS giving up 1.5 and Montrose giving up 1.4 per fixture.
QOTS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Montrose has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, QOTS faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Montrose can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 7.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for QOTS. In practical terms, QOTS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
QOTS has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 7.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Scottish League One (2026-04-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
QOTS
Montrose
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
QOTS
3W 5D 2L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Montrose
4W 1D 5L · 11 goals scored · 14 conceded
Popular Teams