Skip to content
Compare QPR vs Wycombe

QPR vs Wycombe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare QPR vs Wycombe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

QPR QPR Home Team
Wycombe Wycombe Away Team
QPR
46.3
W W W L L L L D D W

Last 10 Matches

Wycombe
46.3
W W L W L L D L L W

Performance Radar

QPR
Wycombe

Categories Won

4

QPR

5

Draw

6

Wycombe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Small (1 goals)
N. Lowe (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
55.6

League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3

48.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.38

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.08

1.96

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
46.3

Attack: 45.8, Defense: 52.8, Form: 42.2

46.3

Attack: 65.3, Defense: 35.9, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

2

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

6
QPR
Wycombe
QPR

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 45.8
Defense 52.8
Form 42.2
Consistency 44.8
Wycombe

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 65.3
Defense 35.9
Form 39.2
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

59.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

53.3 vs 50.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
QPR logo QPR
W
Fiorentina (49%)
W
Wycombe (44%)
W
Wiener Neust (43%)
L
Ipswich (69%)
L
Derby (54%)
L
Swansea (58%)
L
Millwall (60%)
D
Bristol C (56%)
Wycombe logo Wycombe
W
Portsmouth (49%)
W
Yeovil (35%)
L
QPR (50%)
W
Rotherham (37%)
L
Lincoln (66%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
D
Huddersfield (54%)
L
Bradford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fiorentina H
3 - 2 W
49%
Wycombe H
1 - 0 W
44%
Wiener Neust A
3 - 1 W
43%
Ipswich A
0 - 3 L
69%
Derby H
2 - 3 L
54%
Swansea H
1 - 2 L
58%
Millwall A
0 - 2 L
60%
Bristol C H
0 - 0 D
56%
Preston A
1 - 1 D
59%
Watford H
2 - 1 W
41%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portsmouth H
3 - 1 W
49%
Yeovil H
3 - 2 W
35%
QPR A
0 - 1 L
50%
Rotherham H
3 - 2 W
37%
Lincoln A
3 - 4 L
66%
Blackpool H
0 - 1 L
52%
Huddersfield A
3 - 3 D
54%
Bradford H
1 - 2 L
45%
Stockport A
0 - 3 L
59%
Port Vale H
4 - 0 W
53%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.6 vs 48.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Wycombe holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus QPR's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Defensively, QPR holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Wycombe's 1.9.

QPR has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Wycombe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: QPR's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-21), QPR prevailed 1-0 against Wycombe. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. QPR secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Wycombe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. QPR will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

QPR

QPR

VS
Wycombe

Wycombe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

QPR

4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Wycombe

4W 1D 5L · 20 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or