QPR vs Wycombe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare QPR vs Wycombe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
QPR
Home Team
Wycombe
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
QPR
Draw
Wycombe
Statistical Comparison
4W, 2D, 4L
4W, 1D, 5L
13 / 10 matches
20 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
-2
+1
2 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3W / 6 matches
4W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 59.0, Opponent Quality: 53.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.08
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.04
Attack: 45.8, Defense: 52.8, Form: 42.2
Attack: 65.3, Defense: 35.9, Form: 39.2
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
QPR
Wycombe
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 55.6 vs 48.0), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.
Wycombe holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus QPR's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, QPR holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Wycombe's 1.9.
QPR has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Wycombe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: QPR's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.
In their recent Club Friendlies match (2026-07-21), QPR prevailed 1-0 against Wycombe. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. QPR secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Wycombe will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. QPR will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
QPR
Wycombe
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
QPR
4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded
Wycombe
4W 1D 5L · 20 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams