Skip to content
Compare Radcliffe vs Merthyr

Radcliffe vs Merthyr Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Radcliffe vs Merthyr: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Radcliffe Radcliffe Home Team
Merthyr Merthyr Away Team
Radcliffe
28.9
D D W L L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Merthyr
34.8
W L D L L W L L D L

Performance Radar

Radcliffe
Merthyr

Categories Won

2

Radcliffe

3

Draw

10

Merthyr

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 3D, 6L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.3

23 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Clegg (6 goals)
C. Cox (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
17%

1W / 6 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.2

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 43.3

40.9

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.73

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.37

1.42

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
28.9

Attack: 32.7, Defense: 20.8, Form: 8.9

34.8

Attack: 45.5, Defense: 27.3, Form: 18.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

3

46-60'

1
4

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

2
Radcliffe
Merthyr
Radcliffe

Power Rating Breakdown

28.9

Overall

Attack 32.7
Defense 20.8
Form 8.9
Consistency 74.8
Merthyr

Power Rating Breakdown

34.8

Overall

Attack 45.5
Defense 27.3
Form 18.2
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

33.0 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

43.3 vs 45.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Radcliffe logo Radcliffe
D
Barrow (40%)
D
Shrewsbury (40%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
L
South Shields (42%)
L
Fylde (52%)
D
Curzon Ashton (27%)
Merthyr logo Merthyr
W
Briton Ferry Llansawel (50%)
L
Forest Green (53%)
D
Yeovil (35%)
L
Fylde (46%)
L
Scarborough (46%)
W
Marine (37%)
L
Macclesfield (39%)
L
Hereford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barrow H
0 - 0 D
40%
Shrewsbury H
0 - 0 D
40%
Macclesfield H
1 - 0 W
39%
Hereford A
1 - 3 L
45%
Kidderminster H
1 - 3 L
67%
South Shields H
2 - 5 L
42%
Fylde A
3 - 4 L
52%
Curzon Ashton H
3 - 3 D
27%
Worksop A
0 - 2 L
51%
Darlington A
0 - 3 L
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Briton Ferry Llansawel H
3 - 0 W
50%
Forest Green H
1 - 2 L
53%
Yeovil H
2 - 2 D
35%
Fylde H
2 - 4 L
46%
Scarborough A
1 - 2 L
46%
Marine A
3 - 1 W
37%
Macclesfield H
1 - 2 L
39%
Hereford A
0 - 3 L
45%
Oxford City H
1 - 1 D
53%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 39.2 vs 40.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, Merthyr outperforms Radcliffe with 1.5 goals per match to 1.1, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Both defenses are comparable, with Radcliffe conceding 2.3 and Merthyr conceding 2.1 per match.

Radcliffe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Merthyr has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Radcliffe is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Merthyr is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Merthyr faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If Radcliffe can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 65% win probability for Merthyr. In practical terms, Merthyr would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Merthyr, with a 5.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Radcliffe

Radcliffe

VS
Merthyr

Merthyr

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Radcliffe

1W 3D 6L · 11 goals scored · 23 conceded

Merthyr

2W 2D 6L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or