Skip to content
Compare Randers vs Notts Co

Randers vs Notts Co Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Randers vs Notts Co: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Randers Randers Home Team
Notts Co Notts Co Away Team
Randers
34.1
D D W L D W L D L L

Last 10 Matches

Notts Co
43.4
L L W D W D W L L W

Performance Radar

Randers
Notts Co

Categories Won

4

Randers

3

Draw

8

Notts Co

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
C. Edudzi (2 goals)
L. Ness (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.6

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.7

48.6

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.09

1.0

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.1

Adjusted Power Rating
34.1

Attack: 38.8, Defense: 29.9, Form: 17.9

43.4

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 55.9, Form: 39.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

4

31-45'

3
3

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Randers
Notts Co
Randers

Power Rating Breakdown

34.1

Overall

Attack 38.8
Defense 29.9
Form 17.9
Consistency 64.0
Notts Co

Power Rating Breakdown

43.4

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 55.9
Form 39.4
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.0 vs 41.0

Opponent Quality

52.7 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Randers logo Randers
D
Silkeborg (50%)
D
Lechia (41%)
W
Notts Co (45%)
L
Copenhagen (79%)
D
OB (42%)
W
Vejle (44%)
L
Silkeborg (55%)
D
Fredericia (50%)
Notts Co logo Notts Co
L
Forest (55%)
L
Randers (44%)
W
Salford (51%)
D
Chesterfield (51%)
W
Chesterfield (56%)
D
Bristol R (62%)
W
Colchester (58%)
L
Barnet (60%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Silkeborg H
1 - 1 D
50%
Lechia A
2 - 2 D
41%
Notts Co H
3 - 1 W
45%
Copenhagen A
0 - 5 L
79%
OB H
2 - 2 D
42%
Vejle H
1 - 0 W
44%
Silkeborg A
0 - 2 L
55%
Fredericia H
2 - 2 D
50%
OB A
1 - 3 L
47%
Copenhagen H
1 - 2 L
74%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Forest H
0 - 2 L
55%
Randers A
1 - 3 L
44%
Salford H
3 - 0 W
51%
Chesterfield H
0 - 0 D
51%
Chesterfield A
1 - 0 W
56%
Bristol R H
1 - 1 D
62%
Colchester A
1 - 0 W
58%
Barnet H
1 - 2 L
60%
Cambridge U A
0 - 4 L
56%
Newport H
3 - 1 W
43%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.6 vs 48.6), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Randers and Notts Co is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.3 and 1.1 goals per game respectively.

Notts Co has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Randers's 2.0.

Notts Co has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.9 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Randers is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Notts Co. In practical terms, Notts Co would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Notts Co has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Friendly match (2026-07-14), Randers prevailed 3-1 against Notts Co. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Randers secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Notts Co will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Randers will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Randers

Randers

VS
Notts Co

Notts Co

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Randers

2W 4D 4L · 13 goals scored · 20 conceded

Notts Co

4W 2D 4L · 11 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or