RFS vs Vestri Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare RFS vs Vestri: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
RFS
Draw
Vestri
Statistical Comparison
3W, 1D, 2L
0W, 1D, 3L
10 / 6 matches
2 / 4 matches
7 / 6 matches
11 / 4 matches
+3
-9
1 / 6 matches
0 / 4 matches
3 / 6 matches
3 / 4 matches
4 / 6 matches
2 / 4 matches
2W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
1W / 3 matches
0W / 2 matches
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 67.0
League Difficulty: 81.5, Opponent Quality: 67.0
0W / 2 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.24
Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.24
Attack: 59.3, Defense: 62.8, Form: 52.4
Attack: 17.7, Defense: 7.1, Form: 0.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 54.7 vs 56.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
RFS's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with M. Ķigurs leading the charge (2 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.
The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for RFS — 1.2 goals conceded per game and 1 clean sheets put them well ahead of Vestri, who give up 2.8 goals per match at the other end.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Vestri is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 4 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. RFS is on the rise with 3W in last 6, while Vestri shows signs of decline with 0W in last 4.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, RFS faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Vestri can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 34.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for RFS. In practical terms, RFS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, RFS emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 55.7 compared to 21.2, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects RFS as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. These two teams drew 1-1 in the UEFA Conference League (2026-07-30). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-07-23), RFS came out on top with a 4-1 victory over Vestri. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. RFS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-1 scoreline was emphatic — RFS completely dominated Vestri in that encounter, raising serious questions about Vestri's ability to compete at this level. Vestri will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. RFS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
RFS
Vestri
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
RFS
3W 1D 2L · 10 goals scored · 7 conceded
Vestri
0W 1D 3L · 2 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams