Skip to content
Compare Rochdale vs Hartlepool

Rochdale vs Hartlepool Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rochdale vs Hartlepool: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rochdale Rochdale Home Team
Hartlepool Hartlepool Away Team
Rochdale
41.9
D D L D W D W W D L

Last 10 Matches

Hartlepool
45.9
L W W W L W W L D D

Performance Radar

Rochdale
Hartlepool

Categories Won

4

Rochdale

3

Draw

8

Hartlepool

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 5D, 2L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
E. Dieseruvwe (3 goals)
T. Sinclair (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 13
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 13
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
40.6

League Difficulty: 38.0, Opponent Quality: 42.4

45.2

League Difficulty: 39.0, Opponent Quality: 49.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.47

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.13

1.58

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
41.9

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 39.3, Form: 27.2

45.9

Attack: 50.8, Defense: 38.1, Form: 47.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

3
7

76-90+'

Rochdale
Hartlepool
Rochdale

Power Rating Breakdown

41.9

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 39.3
Form 27.2
Consistency 62.8
Hartlepool

Power Rating Breakdown

45.9

Overall

Attack 50.8
Defense 38.1
Form 47.6
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

38.0 vs 39.0

Opponent Quality

42.4 vs 49.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rochdale logo Rochdale
D
Farnham (45%)
D
Rayyan (45%)
L
Utd Manchester (40%)
D
Boreham Wood (65%)
W
Scunthorpe (38%)
D
York (45%)
W
Braintree (28%)
W
Wealdstone (39%)
Hartlepool logo Hartlepool
L
Grimsby (56%)
W
Hebburn (45%)
W
Spennymoor (51%)
W
Redcar Ath. (43%)
L
Boston (54%)
W
Southend (43%)
W
Forest Green (49%)
L
Boreham Wood (65%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Farnham H
2 - 2 D
45%
Rayyan H
3 - 3 D
45%
Utd Manchester A
0 - 2 L
40%
Boreham Wood A
2 - 2 D
65%
Scunthorpe H
2 - 1 W
38%
York H
1 - 1 D
45%
Braintree A
2 - 1 W
28%
Wealdstone H
2 - 1 W
39%
Hartlepool A
0 - 0 D
49%
Morecambe H
2 - 4 L
30%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Grimsby H
0 - 3 L
56%
Hebburn A
3 - 2 W
45%
Spennymoor A
2 - 1 W
51%
Redcar Ath. A
4 - 2 W
43%
Boston A
1 - 3 L
54%
Southend H
4 - 3 W
43%
Forest Green H
2 - 1 W
49%
Boreham Wood A
0 - 3 L
65%
Rochdale H
0 - 0 D
43%
Scunthorpe A
0 - 0 D
44%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 40.6 vs 45.2), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of Rochdale and Hartlepool is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.6 and 1.6 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Rochdale and Hartlepool are evenly matched, allowing 1.7 and 1.8 goals per game respectively.

Rochdale has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Hartlepool has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.4 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Hartlepool has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Hartlepool faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Rochdale can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Hartlepool's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the National League (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rochdale

Rochdale

VS
Hartlepool

Hartlepool

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rochdale

3W 5D 2L · 16 goals scored · 17 conceded

Hartlepool

5W 2D 3L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or