Skip to content
Compare Rosenborg vs Viking

Rosenborg vs Viking Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rosenborg vs Viking: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rosenborg Rosenborg Home Team
Viking Viking Away Team
Rosenborg
46.6
W W L W L W W D L L

Last 10 Matches

Viking
55.3
D L W W D W W L W W

Performance Radar

Rosenborg
Viking

Categories Won

4

Rosenborg

3

Draw

8

Viking

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 1D, 4L

60%

6W, 2D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

+8

+8

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Chiakha (8 goals)
P. Christiansen (6 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 11
1st Half: 11 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

100%

3W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.4

League Difficulty: 49.5, Opponent Quality: 50.2

39.4

League Difficulty: 54.7, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.98

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.02

1.97

Actual: 2.1 | Diff: +0.13

Adjusted Power Rating
46.6

Attack: 58.3, Defense: 40.8, Form: 43.7

55.3

Attack: 62.6, Defense: 50.7, Form: 53.6

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3
4

31-45'

4
1

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

2
7

76-90+'

4
Rosenborg
Viking
Rosenborg

Power Rating Breakdown

46.6

Overall

Attack 58.3
Defense 40.8
Form 43.7
Consistency 38.8
Viking

Power Rating Breakdown

55.3

Overall

Attack 62.6
Defense 50.7
Form 53.6
Consistency 52.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

49.5 vs 54.7

Opponent Quality

50.2 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rosenborg logo Rosenborg
W
Viking (59%)
W
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Brann (64%)
W
Fredrikstad (48%)
L
Man Utd (50%)
W
Start (38%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
D
Bodø/Glimt (70%)
Viking logo Viking
D
Dinamo Zagreb (90%)
L
Rosenborg (56%)
W
Sarpsborg (52%)
W
Start (38%)
D
Aalesund (50%)
W
Lillestrøm (47%)
W
Sandefjord (38%)
L
Sarpsborg (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Viking H
2 - 1 W
59%
Lillestrøm A
2 - 0 W
47%
Brann A
2 - 3 L
64%
Fredrikstad H
4 - 0 W
48%
Man Utd H
0 - 5 L
50%
Start A
3 - 0 W
38%
Kristiansund H
3 - 0 W
35%
Bodø/Glimt H
2 - 2 D
70%
KFUM A
0 - 2 L
47%
Aalesund H
2 - 3 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dinamo Zagreb A
2 - 2 D
90%
Rosenborg A
1 - 2 L
56%
Sarpsborg H
2 - 1 W
52%
Start A
3 - 0 W
38%
Aalesund A
1 - 1 D
50%
Lillestrøm A
2 - 1 W
47%
Sandefjord H
2 - 1 W
38%
Sarpsborg A
0 - 1 L
57%
Kristiansund A
2 - 1 W
40%
Start H
6 - 3 W
33%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 37.4 vs 39.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Rosenborg averaging 2.0 and Viking averaging 2.1 goals per match.

Viking has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Rosenborg's 1.6.

Viking has an exceptional home record with a 100% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Statistical modeling projects 3.5 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Rosenborg has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📈 Form Momentum: Viking has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Viking faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Rosenborg can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for Viking. In practical terms, Viking would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Viking, with a 8.7-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-14), Rosenborg prevailed 2-1 against Viking. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Rosenborg secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Viking will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Rosenborg will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rosenborg

Rosenborg

VS
Viking

Viking

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rosenborg

5W 1D 4L · 20 goals scored · 16 conceded

Viking

6W 2D 2L · 21 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or