Skip to content
Compare Rotherham vs Wycombe

Rotherham vs Wycombe Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rotherham vs Wycombe: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rotherham Rotherham Home Team
Wycombe Wycombe Away Team
Rotherham
35.0
L W D D L D L W L L

Last 10 Matches

Wycombe
46.3
W W L W L L D L L W

Performance Radar

Rotherham
Wycombe

Categories Won

4

Rotherham

2

Draw

9

Wycombe

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

40%

4W, 1D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-7

-7

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Nombe (3 goals)
N. Lowe (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.9

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.2

48.0

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.82

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.08

1.96

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
35.0

Attack: 29.1, Defense: 45.2, Form: 19.4

46.3

Attack: 65.3, Defense: 35.9, Form: 39.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
4

16-30'

2

31-45'

1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

6
Rotherham
Wycombe
Rotherham

Power Rating Breakdown

35.0

Overall

Attack 29.1
Defense 45.2
Form 19.4
Consistency 61.3
Wycombe

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 65.3
Defense 35.9
Form 39.2
Consistency 39.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

48.2 vs 50.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rotherham logo Rotherham
L
Sheff Utd (53%)
W
Alfreton (50%)
D
Matlock (47%)
D
Emley (44%)
L
Wycombe (49%)
D
Reading (38%)
L
Luton (66%)
W
L Orient (40%)
Wycombe logo Wycombe
W
Portsmouth (49%)
W
Yeovil (35%)
L
QPR (50%)
W
Rotherham (37%)
L
Lincoln (66%)
L
Blackpool (52%)
D
Huddersfield (54%)
L
Bradford (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sheff Utd H
0 - 2 L
53%
Alfreton A
1 - 0 W
50%
Matlock A
1 - 1 D
47%
Emley A
1 - 1 D
44%
Wycombe A
2 - 3 L
49%
Reading H
1 - 1 D
38%
Luton H
0 - 2 L
66%
L Orient A
2 - 0 W
40%
Wigan A
0 - 3 L
52%
Barnsley H
1 - 3 L
43%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Portsmouth H
3 - 1 W
49%
Yeovil H
3 - 2 W
35%
QPR A
0 - 1 L
50%
Rotherham H
3 - 2 W
37%
Lincoln A
3 - 4 L
66%
Blackpool H
0 - 1 L
52%
Huddersfield A
3 - 3 D
54%
Bradford H
1 - 2 L
45%
Stockport A
0 - 3 L
59%
Port Vale H
4 - 0 W
53%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.9 vs 48.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Few sides can match Wycombe in front of goal. Their 2.0 average per fixture tells the story, with N. Lowe driving that output personally responsible for 2 goals this campaign.

Defensively, Rotherham and Wycombe are evenly matched, allowing 1.6 and 1.9 goals per game respectively.

Rotherham has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Wycombe has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

❄️ Form Momentum: Rotherham is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Wycombe faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.9 goals per match. If Rotherham can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 78% win probability for Wycombe. In practical terms, Wycombe would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Wycombe holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 11.3-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent League One match (2026-05-02), Wycombe prevailed 3-2 against Rotherham. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Wycombe secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Rotherham will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Wycombe will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rotherham

Rotherham

VS
Wycombe

Wycombe

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rotherham

2W 3D 5L · 9 goals scored · 16 conceded

Wycombe

4W 1D 5L · 20 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or