Skip to content
Compare Rothes vs Forres

Rothes vs Forres Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rothes vs Forres: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rothes Rothes Home Team
Forres Forres Away Team
Rothes
22.6
L L L L L L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Forres
36.4
W L D L L W W D L L

Performance Radar

Rothes
Forres

Categories Won

2

Rothes

3

Draw

10

Forres

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 0D, 10L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
4.0

40 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-31

-31

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
100%

10 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Thomson (4 goals)
C. Frame (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.3

35.2

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 42.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.7

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.2

1.31

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.19

Adjusted Power Rating
22.6

Attack: 25.4, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0

36.4

Attack: 42.6, Defense: 34.1, Form: 25.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

3

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

4

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

6
Rothes
Forres
Rothes

Power Rating Breakdown

22.6

Overall

Attack 25.4
Defense 0.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 100.0
Forres

Power Rating Breakdown

36.4

Overall

Attack 42.6
Defense 34.1
Form 25.6
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 42.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rothes logo Rothes
L
Nairn (39%)
L
Keith (51%)
L
Huntly (44%)
L
Fraserburgh (51%)
L
Clachnacuddin (36%)
L
Lossiemouth (22%)
L
Formartine Utd (58%)
L
Turriff Utd (45%)
Forres logo Forres
W
Keith (51%)
L
Formartine Utd (58%)
D
Clachnacuddin (36%)
L
Brechin (28%)
L
Keith (56%)
W
Wick (28%)
W
Deveronvale (22%)
D
Turriff Utd (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nairn A
0 - 3 L
39%
Keith H
1 - 5 L
51%
Huntly A
1 - 3 L
44%
Fraserburgh H
2 - 5 L
51%
Clachnacuddin H
1 - 5 L
36%
Lossiemouth H
0 - 3 L
22%
Formartine Utd A
0 - 4 L
58%
Turriff Utd A
0 - 3 L
45%
Inverurie H
2 - 6 L
33%
Strathspey A
2 - 3 L
34%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Keith H
5 - 1 W
51%
Formartine Utd A
1 - 2 L
58%
Clachnacuddin H
1 - 1 D
36%
Brechin H
0 - 1 L
28%
Keith A
0 - 1 L
56%
Wick A
3 - 1 W
28%
Deveronvale A
2 - 1 W
22%
Turriff Utd A
2 - 2 D
45%
Buckie Thistle H
0 - 4 L
47%
Banks O' Dee A
1 - 4 L
49%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (34.8 vs 35.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Forres outperforms Rothes with 1.5 goals per match to 0.9, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Forres holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.8 goals per game and recording 0 clean sheets, compared to Rothes's leaky backline that surrenders 4.0 goals per match.

Rothes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Forres has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Rothes is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Forres is on the rise with 3W in last 10, while Rothes shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Forres faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.8 goals per match. If Rothes can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 13.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 84% win probability for Forres. In practical terms, Forres would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Forres has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 13.8-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rothes

Rothes

VS
Forres

Forres

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rothes

0W 0D 10L · 9 goals scored · 40 conceded

Forres

3W 2D 5L · 15 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or