Skip to content
Compare Rothes vs Wick

Rothes vs Wick Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rothes vs Wick: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rothes Rothes Home Team
Wick Wick Away Team
Rothes
22.6
L L L L L L L L L L

Last 10 Matches

Wick
27.6
L D L L W L L L L W

Performance Radar

Rothes
Wick

Categories Won

5

Rothes

4

Draw

6

Wick

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 0D, 10L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

9 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
4.0

40 / 10 matches

2.1

21 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-31

-31

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
100%

10 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Thomson (4 goals)
M. MacGregor (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 4
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
34.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.3

34.4

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 40.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.7

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.2

0.65

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.25

Adjusted Power Rating
22.6

Attack: 25.4, Defense: 0.0, Form: 0.0

27.6

Attack: 25.3, Defense: 25.3, Form: 16.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

1
Rothes
Wick
Rothes

Power Rating Breakdown

22.6

Overall

Attack 25.4
Defense 0.0
Form 0.0
Consistency 100.0
Wick

Power Rating Breakdown

27.6

Overall

Attack 25.3
Defense 25.3
Form 16.9
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

41.3 vs 40.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rothes logo Rothes
L
Nairn (39%)
L
Keith (51%)
L
Huntly (44%)
L
Fraserburgh (51%)
L
Clachnacuddin (36%)
L
Lossiemouth (22%)
L
Formartine Utd (58%)
L
Turriff Utd (45%)
Wick logo Wick
L
Banks O' Dee (49%)
D
Banks O' Dee (44%)
L
Buckie Thistle (47%)
L
Banks O' Dee (49%)
W
Turriff Utd (45%)
L
Forres (33%)
L
Brechin (28%)
L
Strathspey (34%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Nairn A
0 - 3 L
39%
Keith H
1 - 5 L
51%
Huntly A
1 - 3 L
44%
Fraserburgh H
2 - 5 L
51%
Clachnacuddin H
1 - 5 L
36%
Lossiemouth H
0 - 3 L
22%
Formartine Utd A
0 - 4 L
58%
Turriff Utd A
0 - 3 L
45%
Inverurie H
2 - 6 L
33%
Strathspey A
2 - 3 L
34%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Banks O' Dee A
0 - 2 L
49%
Banks O' Dee H
1 - 1 D
44%
Buckie Thistle H
0 - 3 L
47%
Banks O' Dee A
1 - 6 L
49%
Turriff Utd A
1 - 0 W
45%
Forres H
1 - 3 L
33%
Brechin H
0 - 1 L
28%
Strathspey A
0 - 2 L
34%
Keith H
2 - 3 L
51%
Lossiemouth A
3 - 0 W
27%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 34.8 vs 34.4), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

The attacking output of Rothes and Wick is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 0.9 and 0.9 goals per game respectively.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Wick — 2.1 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of Rothes, who give up 4.0 goals per match at the other end.

Rothes has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Wick has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.0 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Rothes is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Wick is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Wick faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.1 goals per match. If Rothes can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 62% win probability for Wick. In practical terms, Wick would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

Wick has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 5.0-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rothes

Rothes

VS
Wick

Wick

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rothes

0W 0D 10L · 9 goals scored · 40 conceded

Wick

2W 1D 7L · 9 goals scored · 21 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or