Skip to content
Compare Rukh Vynnyky vs KFUM

Rukh Vynnyky vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rukh Vynnyky vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rukh Vynnyky Rukh Vynnyky Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Rukh Vynnyky
28.6
L L L D L L L D L L

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
32.8
D W L L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Rukh Vynnyky
KFUM

Categories Won

2

Rukh Vynnyky

4

Draw

9

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 2D, 8L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
0.5

5 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Roman (2 goals)
T. Haltvik (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 3
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
64.3

League Difficulty: 98.0, Opponent Quality: 71.6

37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.63

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: -0.13

0.79

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
28.6

Attack: 19.0, Defense: 34.3, Form: 0.0

32.8

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 38.0, Form: 17.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

2
1

61-75'

1
2

76-90+'

Rukh Vynnyky
KFUM
Rukh Vynnyky

Power Rating Breakdown

28.6

Overall

Attack 19.0
Defense 34.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 95.2
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

32.8

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 38.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

98.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

71.6 vs 50.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rukh Vynnyky logo Rukh Vynnyky
L
Polissya (84%)
L
Oleksandria (52%)
L
Kudrivka (60%)
D
Veres Rivne (59%)
L
Zorya (74%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (77%)
L
Kryvbas KR (77%)
D
Kolos (77%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Tromsø (50%)
W
Rosenborg (39%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
D
Vålerenga (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (42%)
L
HamKam (57%)
D
Aalesund (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Polissya A
0 - 2 L
84%
Oleksandria H
1 - 3 L
52%
Kudrivka A
1 - 2 L
60%
Veres Rivne H
0 - 0 D
59%
Zorya H
1 - 2 L
74%
Karpaty Lviv H
0 - 3 L
77%
Kryvbas KR A
0 - 3 L
77%
Kolos H
1 - 1 D
77%
Shakhtar D A
0 - 3 L
83%
LNZ Cherkasy H
1 - 2 L
73%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
50%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
39%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
54%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
71%
Vålerenga A
2 - 2 D
47%
Sarpsborg H
1 - 0 W
42%
HamKam A
0 - 4 L
57%
Aalesund A
2 - 2 D
50%
Sandefjord H
1 - 2 L
47%
Fredrikstad A
1 - 3 L
52%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Rukh Vynnyky has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 64.3) compared to KFUM (SoS: 37.8). This means Rukh Vynnyky's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

KFUM holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Rukh Vynnyky's 0.5, though the gap is not insurmountable.

KFUM has the defensive edge, conceding 1.7 per match compared to Rukh Vynnyky's 2.1.

Rukh Vynnyky has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 7 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rukh Vynnyky

Rukh Vynnyky

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rukh Vynnyky

0W 2D 8L · 5 goals scored · 21 conceded

KFUM

2W 3D 5L · 10 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or