Skip to content
Compare Rwanda vs South Africa

Rwanda vs South Africa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Rwanda vs South Africa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Rwanda Rwanda Home Team
South Africa South Africa Away Team
Rwanda
43.6
W W L L W L L

Last 10 Matches

South Africa
42.2
L W D L W D L D L W

Performance Radar

Rwanda
South Africa

Categories Won

8

Rwanda

2

Draw

5

South Africa

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
43%

3W, 0D, 4L

30%

3W, 3D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

7 / 7 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

7 / 7 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
0

0

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
43%

3 / 7 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
29%

2 / 7 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
0%

0 / 7 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Mickels (1 goals)
O. Appollis (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.3

League Difficulty: 68.6, Opponent Quality: 56.7

51.0

League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 60.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.39

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.39

0.78

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
43.6

Attack: 32.4, Defense: 64.9, Form: 41.8

42.2

Attack: 30.3, Defense: 64.0, Form: 30.3

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

1

46-60'

2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

3
Rwanda
South Africa
Rwanda

Power Rating Breakdown

43.6

Overall

Attack 32.4
Defense 64.9
Form 41.8
Consistency 33.9
South Africa

Power Rating Breakdown

42.2

Overall

Attack 30.3
Defense 64.0
Form 30.3
Consistency 53.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

68.6 vs 75.0

Opponent Quality

56.7 vs 60.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Rwanda logo Rwanda
W
Estonia (44%)
W
Grenada (65%)
L
South Africa (54%)
L
Benin (39%)
W
Zimbabwe (54%)
L
Nigeria (69%)
L
Algeria (72%)
South Africa logo South Africa
L
Canada (68%)
W
South Korea (68%)
D
Czech Republic (71%)
L
Mexico (84%)
W
Jamaica (65%)
D
Nicaragua (41%)
L
Panama (52%)
D
Panama (52%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Estonia H
2 - 0 W
44%
Grenada H
4 - 0 W
65%
South Africa A
0 - 3 L
54%
Benin H
0 - 1 L
39%
Zimbabwe A
1 - 0 W
54%
Nigeria A
0 - 1 L
69%
Algeria A
0 - 2 L
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Canada H
0 - 1 L
68%
South Korea H
1 - 0 W
68%
Czech Republic A
1 - 1 D
71%
Mexico A
0 - 2 L
84%
Jamaica A
1 - 0 W
65%
Nicaragua H
0 - 0 D
41%
Panama H
1 - 2 L
52%
Panama H
1 - 1 D
52%
Cameroon H
1 - 2 L
51%
Zimbabwe A
3 - 2 W
48%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.3 vs 51.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Rwanda (1.0 goals per match) and South Africa (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

The defensive records are closely aligned, with Rwanda giving up 1.0 and South Africa giving up 1.1 per fixture.

Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: South Africa's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - African (2025-10-14): South Africa defeated Rwanda 3-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates South Africa's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Rwanda. South Africa secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — South Africa completely dominated Rwanda in that encounter, raising serious questions about Rwanda's ability to compete at this level. Rwanda will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Africa will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Rwanda

Rwanda

VS
South Africa

South Africa

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Rwanda

3W 0D 4L · 7 goals scored · 7 conceded

South Africa

3W 3D 4L · 9 goals scored · 11 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or