Rwanda vs South Africa Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Rwanda vs South Africa: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Rwanda
Home Team
South Africa
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Rwanda
Draw
South Africa
Statistical Comparison
3W, 0D, 4L
3W, 3D, 4L
7 / 7 matches
9 / 10 matches
7 / 7 matches
11 / 10 matches
0
-2
3 / 7 matches
3 / 10 matches
2 / 7 matches
3 / 10 matches
0 / 7 matches
5 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 6 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 68.6, Opponent Quality: 56.7
League Difficulty: 75.0, Opponent Quality: 60.0
0W / 1 matches
0W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.39
Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.12
Attack: 32.4, Defense: 64.9, Form: 41.8
Attack: 30.3, Defense: 64.0, Form: 30.3
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Rwanda
South Africa
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 47.3 vs 51.0), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Rwanda (1.0 goals per match) and South Africa (0.9 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
The defensive records are closely aligned, with Rwanda giving up 1.0 and South Africa giving up 1.1 per fixture.
Statistical modeling projects 2.0 goals in this fixture. The data points Under 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at unlikely based on both sides' scoring records.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: South Africa's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.
These two teams met recently in the FIFA World Cup Qualifying - African (2025-10-14): South Africa defeated Rwanda 3-0. Winning in a high-pressure tournament like this demonstrates South Africa's ability to perform on the biggest stage against Rwanda. South Africa secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — South Africa completely dominated Rwanda in that encounter, raising serious questions about Rwanda's ability to compete at this level. Rwanda will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Africa will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Rwanda
South Africa
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Rwanda
3W 0D 4L · 7 goals scored · 7 conceded
South Africa
3W 3D 4L · 9 goals scored · 11 conceded
Popular Teams