Skip to content
Compare Salford vs Chesterfield

Salford vs Chesterfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Salford vs Chesterfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Salford Salford Home Team
Chesterfield Chesterfield Away Team
Salford
46.7
L L D D W W W L D W

Last 10 Matches

Chesterfield
45.0
W L L L D L W W D W

Performance Radar

Salford
Chesterfield

Categories Won

6

Salford

4

Draw

5

Chesterfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+1

+1

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Cesay (2 goals)
L. Bonis (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.2

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 48.6

46.8

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.53

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.17

0.88

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
46.7

Attack: 54.5, Defense: 44.9, Form: 38.5

45.0

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 67.8, Form: 38.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

61-75'

2
3

76-90+'

1
Salford
Chesterfield
Salford

Power Rating Breakdown

46.7

Overall

Attack 54.5
Defense 44.9
Form 38.5
Consistency 50.5
Chesterfield

Power Rating Breakdown

45.0

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 67.8
Form 38.7
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.5 vs 41.0

Opponent Quality

48.6 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Salford logo Salford
L
Chesterfield (44%)
L
Barnet (60%)
D
Shrewsbury (35%)
D
Bradford (55%)
W
Carlisle (58%)
W
Dundee Utd (40%)
W
Utd Manchester (38%)
L
Notts Co (49%)
Chesterfield logo Chesterfield
W
Salford (51%)
L
Fleetwood (51%)
L
Fleetwood (58%)
L
Halifax (62%)
D
Notts Co (49%)
L
Notts Co (44%)
W
Swindon (39%)
W
Crewe (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chesterfield H
0 - 1 L
44%
Barnet A
1 - 3 L
60%
Shrewsbury H
1 - 1 D
35%
Bradford H
2 - 2 D
55%
Carlisle A
2 - 0 W
58%
Dundee Utd H
3 - 2 W
40%
Utd Manchester A
4 - 1 W
38%
Notts Co A
0 - 3 L
49%
Grimsby H
2 - 2 D
51%
Grimsby A
2 - 1 W
56%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Salford A
1 - 0 W
51%
Fleetwood H
0 - 1 L
51%
Fleetwood A
0 - 1 L
58%
Halifax A
2 - 3 L
62%
Notts Co A
0 - 0 D
49%
Notts Co H
0 - 1 L
44%
Swindon A
2 - 1 W
39%
Crewe H
2 - 0 W
46%
Fleetwood A
1 - 1 D
56%
Grimsby H
2 - 1 W
51%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (46.2 vs 46.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Offensively, Salford outperforms Chesterfield with 1.7 goals per match to 1.0, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Chesterfield has the defensive edge, conceding 0.9 per match compared to Salford's 1.6.

Salford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chesterfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Salford is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Salford has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Chesterfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

This is a genuine coin-flip. Both teams are remarkably evenly matched across all metrics, and the outcome will likely be decided by small margins on the day.

In their recent League Two match (2026-08-22), Chesterfield prevailed 0-1 against Salford. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Chesterfield achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Salford shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Salford will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chesterfield will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Salford

Salford

VS
Chesterfield

Chesterfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Salford

4W 3D 3L · 17 goals scored · 16 conceded

Chesterfield

4W 2D 4L · 10 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or