Skip to content
Compare Salisbury vs Bath

Salisbury vs Bath Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Salisbury vs Bath: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Salisbury Salisbury Home Team
Bath Bath Away Team
Salisbury
41.4
D W L L L W W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Bath
36.1
D L L W L W L W L D

Performance Radar

Salisbury
Bath

Categories Won

9

Salisbury

2

Draw

4

Bath

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.2

22 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Odokonyero (5 goals)
S. Wilson (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
33.6

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 36.0

40.6

League Difficulty: 33.0, Opponent Quality: 45.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.38

1.4

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.2

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 47.4, Defense: 41.8, Form: 33.4

36.1

Attack: 48.3, Defense: 24.2, Form: 27.2

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
4

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

1
4

76-90+'

3
Salisbury
Bath
Salisbury

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 47.4
Defense 41.8
Form 33.4
Consistency 44.8
Bath

Power Rating Breakdown

36.1

Overall

Attack 48.3
Defense 24.2
Form 27.2
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 33.0

Opponent Quality

36.0 vs 45.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Salisbury logo Salisbury
D
Hemel H (45%)
W
Horsham (33%)
L
Tonbridge (47%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Dover (20%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Slough (26%)
Bath logo Bath
D
Newport (45%)
L
Plymouth (62%)
L
Maidstone (57%)
W
Dorking (39%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Chesham (43%)
L
Torquay (53%)
W
Chippenham (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hemel H A
1 - 1 D
45%
Horsham H
2 - 1 W
33%
Tonbridge A
2 - 3 L
47%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 2 L
36%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Dover H
2 - 1 W
20%
Enfield T H
2 - 0 W
33%
Slough A
3 - 3 D
26%
Torquay A
1 - 2 L
53%
Eastbourne H
2 - 0 W
24%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Newport H
2 - 2 D
45%
Plymouth H
0 - 3 L
62%
Maidstone H
2 - 3 L
57%
Dorking A
3 - 1 W
39%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Chesham H
4 - 2 W
43%
Torquay A
1 - 4 L
53%
Chippenham H
1 - 0 W
38%
Maidenhead A
0 - 3 L
48%
Eastbourne A
2 - 2 D
29%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 33.6 vs 40.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Salisbury (1.7 goals per match) and Bath (1.6 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.

Salisbury has the defensive edge, conceding 1.5 per match compared to Bath's 2.2.

Salisbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Bath has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Salisbury has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Salisbury faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Bath can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 5.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 63% win probability for Salisbury. In practical terms, Salisbury would win 6 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Salisbury, with a 5.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Salisbury

Salisbury

VS
Bath

Bath

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Salisbury

4W 2D 4L · 17 goals scored · 15 conceded

Bath

3W 2D 5L · 16 goals scored · 22 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or