Skip to content
Compare Salisbury vs Farnborough

Salisbury vs Farnborough Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Salisbury vs Farnborough: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Salisbury Salisbury Home Team
Farnborough Farnborough Away Team
Salisbury
41.4
D W L L L W W D L W

Last 10 Matches

Farnborough
46.3
L W L W W L D W W L

Performance Radar

Salisbury
Farnborough

Categories Won

2

Salisbury

5

Draw

8

Farnborough

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

2.4

24 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+4

+4

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Odokonyero (5 goals)
M. Bloomfield (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 10 / 2nd Half: 14
Home Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
33.6

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 36.0

35.6

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 38.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.32

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.38

1.99

Actual: 2.4 | Diff: +0.41

Adjusted Power Rating
41.4

Attack: 47.4, Defense: 41.8, Form: 33.4

46.3

Attack: 68.5, Defense: 28.5, Form: 42.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

5
4

46-60'

5
3

61-75'

7
4

76-90+'

2
Salisbury
Farnborough
Salisbury

Power Rating Breakdown

41.4

Overall

Attack 47.4
Defense 41.8
Form 33.4
Consistency 44.8
Farnborough

Power Rating Breakdown

46.3

Overall

Attack 68.5
Defense 28.5
Form 42.8
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 31.5

Opponent Quality

36.0 vs 38.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Salisbury logo Salisbury
D
Hemel H (45%)
W
Horsham (33%)
L
Tonbridge (47%)
L
Weston-s-Mare (36%)
L
Totton (43%)
W
Dover (20%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Slough (26%)
Farnborough logo Farnborough
L
Aldershot (42%)
W
Totton (43%)
L
Tonbridge (42%)
W
Dover (25%)
W
Horsham (33%)
L
Hampton & RB (44%)
D
Hornchurch (53%)
W
Chelmsford (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hemel H A
1 - 1 D
45%
Horsham H
2 - 1 W
33%
Tonbridge A
2 - 3 L
47%
Weston-s-Mare H
1 - 2 L
36%
Totton A
1 - 2 L
43%
Dover H
2 - 1 W
20%
Enfield T H
2 - 0 W
33%
Slough A
3 - 3 D
26%
Torquay A
1 - 2 L
53%
Eastbourne H
2 - 0 W
24%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Aldershot A
1 - 2 L
42%
Totton A
6 - 1 W
43%
Tonbridge H
1 - 6 L
42%
Dover A
3 - 1 W
25%
Horsham H
2 - 0 W
33%
Hampton & RB A
1 - 3 L
44%
Hornchurch H
2 - 2 D
53%
Chelmsford H
4 - 2 W
40%
Slough H
2 - 0 W
21%
Dag & Red H
2 - 3 L
40%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 33.6 vs 35.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Farnborough holds the attacking edge with 2.4 goals per match versus Salisbury's 1.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Salisbury's backline outperforms Farnborough's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

Salisbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Farnborough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Salisbury has an exceptional home record with a 80% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

📈 Form Momentum: Farnborough has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Farnborough faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 2.0 goals per match. If Salisbury can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: Farnborough's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Salisbury

Salisbury

VS
Farnborough

Farnborough

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Salisbury

4W 2D 4L · 17 goals scored · 15 conceded

Farnborough

5W 1D 4L · 24 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or