Skip to content
Compare Sandefjord vs KFUM

Sandefjord vs KFUM Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Sandefjord vs KFUM: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Sandefjord Sandefjord Home Team
KFUM KFUM Away Team
Sandefjord
33.2
W L L L L D L D L W

Last 10 Matches

KFUM
35.9
D W W L L L D W L L

Performance Radar

Sandefjord
KFUM

Categories Won

2

Sandefjord

4

Draw

9

KFUM

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 2D, 6L

30%

3W, 2D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-6

-6

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
N. Möller (3 goals)
B. Njie (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
37.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 50.9

38.1

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 51.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.94

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.06

1.02

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
33.2

Attack: 29.3, Defense: 41.0, Form: 17.6

35.9

Attack: 29.4, Defense: 47.0, Form: 26.4

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3
1

16-30'

3

31-45'

4

46-60'

3
3

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Sandefjord
KFUM
Sandefjord

Power Rating Breakdown

33.2

Overall

Attack 29.3
Defense 41.0
Form 17.6
Consistency 59.2
KFUM

Power Rating Breakdown

35.9

Overall

Attack 29.4
Defense 47.0
Form 26.4
Consistency 49.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

50.9 vs 51.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Sandefjord logo Sandefjord
W
Sarpsborg (57%)
L
KFUM (42%)
L
Fredrikstad (53%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (70%)
L
Viking (64%)
D
HamKam (40%)
L
Molde (53%)
D
Fredrikstad (48%)
KFUM logo KFUM
D
Lillestrøm (42%)
W
Sandefjord (43%)
W
Kristiansund (35%)
L
Molde (48%)
L
Lillestrøm (47%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (70%)
D
Tromsø (58%)
W
Rosenborg (51%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sarpsborg A
2 - 1 W
57%
KFUM H
0 - 1 L
42%
Fredrikstad A
0 - 1 L
53%
Bodø/Glimt H
0 - 3 L
70%
Viking A
1 - 2 L
64%
HamKam H
2 - 2 D
40%
Molde A
1 - 2 L
53%
Fredrikstad H
1 - 1 D
48%
Lillestrøm A
1 - 3 L
47%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
35%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lillestrøm H
1 - 1 D
42%
Sandefjord A
1 - 0 W
43%
Kristiansund H
2 - 1 W
35%
Molde H
2 - 4 L
48%
Lillestrøm A
1 - 2 L
47%
Bodø/Glimt H
0 - 2 L
70%
Tromsø H
0 - 0 D
58%
Rosenborg H
2 - 0 W
51%
Brann A
1 - 2 L
64%
Viking H
0 - 2 L
59%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 37.8 vs 38.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Sandefjord averaging 1.0 and KFUM averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Defensively, Sandefjord and KFUM are evenly matched, allowing 1.6 and 1.4 goals per game respectively.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Sandefjord is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: KFUM's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

The data offers no clear edge here. These sides are separated by the finest of margins across every key metric, making the final result almost impossible to call in advance.

In their recent Norwegian Eliteserien match (2026-08-07), KFUM prevailed 0-1 against Sandefjord. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, KFUM achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Sandefjord shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Sandefjord will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. KFUM will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Sandefjord

Sandefjord

VS
KFUM

KFUM

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Sandefjord

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded

KFUM

3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or