Skip to content
Compare São Tomé vs Ethiopia

São Tomé vs Ethiopia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare São Tomé vs Ethiopia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

São Tomé São Tomé Home Team
Ethiopia Ethiopia Away Team
São Tomé
21.9
L L W L L L

Last 10 Matches

Ethiopia
49.9
D W W W L W L L

Performance Radar

São Tomé
Ethiopia

Categories Won

2

São Tomé

2

Draw

11

Ethiopia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
17%

1W, 0D, 5L

50%

4W, 1D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.5

3 / 6 matches

1.0

8 / 8 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.7

16 / 6 matches

1.0

8 / 8 matches

Goal Difference
-13

-13

0

0

Clean Sheet
17%

1 / 6 matches

50%

4 / 8 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
67%

4 / 6 matches

25%

2 / 8 matches

Both Teams to Score
17%

1 / 6 matches

25%

2 / 8 matches

Top Scorer
Ronaldo Lumungo (3 goals)
R. James (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 1
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

75%

3W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 2 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.1

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 45.2

55.1

League Difficulty: 61.2, Opponent Quality: 51.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.32

Actual: 0.5 | Diff: +0.18

1.08

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
21.9

Attack: 16.5, Defense: 9.9, Form: 16.8

49.9

Attack: 35.0, Defense: 70.1, Form: 52.6

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

46-60'

1

61-75'

76-90+'

1
São Tomé
Ethiopia
São Tomé

Power Rating Breakdown

21.9

Overall

Attack 16.5
Defense 9.9
Form 16.8
Consistency 62.5
Ethiopia

Power Rating Breakdown

49.9

Overall

Attack 35.0
Defense 70.1
Form 52.6
Consistency 40.5

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 61.2

Opponent Quality

45.2 vs 51.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
São Tomé logo São Tomé
L
Ethiopia (51%)
L
Ethiopia (47%)
W
Malawi (50%)
L
Tunisia (35%)
L
Namibia (44%)
L
Equat Guinea (44%)
Ethiopia logo Ethiopia
D
Malawi (58%)
W
Malawi (58%)
W
São Tomé (32%)
W
São Tomé (35%)
L
Burkina Faso (63%)
W
Guinea-Bissau (42%)
L
Sierra Leone (60%)
L
Egypt (61%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ethiopia A
0 - 1 L
51%
Ethiopia H
0 - 3 L
47%
Malawi H
1 - 0 W
50%
Tunisia H
0 - 6 L
35%
Namibia A
0 - 3 L
44%
Equat Guinea H
2 - 3 L
44%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Malawi H
1 - 1 D
58%
Malawi H
1 - 0 W
58%
São Tomé H
1 - 0 W
32%
São Tomé A
3 - 0 W
35%
Burkina Faso A
1 - 3 L
63%
Guinea-Bissau H
1 - 0 W
42%
Sierra Leone A
0 - 2 L
60%
Egypt A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 49.1 vs 55.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Ethiopia leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.0 goals per game compared to São Tomé's 0.5 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Ethiopia is far superior, conceding just 1.0 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while São Tomé leaks 2.7 goals per match.

São Tomé has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Ethiopia has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Ethiopia has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.6 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: São Tomé is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 6 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Ethiopia has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.62 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Ethiopia is on the rise with 4W in last 8, while São Tomé shows signs of decline with 1W in last 6.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Ethiopia faces a key vulnerability: their away form is significantly weaker than their home record. If São Tomé can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 28.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Ethiopia. In practical terms, Ethiopia would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward Ethiopia in this contest. Their superior power rating of 49.9, compared to 21.9 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In the CAF Africa Cup of Nations Qualifiers (2026-03-31), Ethiopia eliminated São Tomé with a 1-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Ethiopia showed they can handle the pressure. Ethiopia secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. São Tomé will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ethiopia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In the CAF Africa Cup of Nations Qualifiers (2026-03-27), Ethiopia eliminated São Tomé with a 0-3 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Ethiopia showed they can handle the pressure. Notably, Ethiopia achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against São Tomé shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 0-3 scoreline was emphatic — Ethiopia completely dominated São Tomé in that encounter, raising serious questions about São Tomé's ability to compete at this level. São Tomé will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Ethiopia will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

São Tomé

São Tomé

VS
Ethiopia

Ethiopia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

São Tomé

1W 0D 5L · 3 goals scored · 16 conceded

Ethiopia

4W 1D 3L · 8 goals scored · 8 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or