Skip to content
Compare Sounders vs Minnesota

Sounders vs Minnesota Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Sounders vs Minnesota: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Sounders Sounders Home Team
Minnesota Minnesota Away Team
Sounders
30.1
D L L L L L L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Minnesota
42.0
W L D D D L D L L D

Performance Radar

Sounders
Minnesota

Categories Won

2

Sounders

4

Draw

9

Minnesota

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 1D, 8L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.1

21 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-13

-13

0

0

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
K. Kossa-Rienzi (2 goals)
K. Yeboah (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

25%

1W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
51.9

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 49.8

50.7

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.75

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.05

1.35

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.05

Adjusted Power Rating
30.1

Attack: 27.2, Defense: 30.6, Form: 10.2

42.0

Attack: 43.6, Defense: 57.1, Form: 10.1

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
1

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
4

76-90+'

4
Sounders
Minnesota
Sounders

Power Rating Breakdown

30.1

Overall

Attack 27.2
Defense 30.6
Form 10.2
Consistency 74.8
Minnesota

Power Rating Breakdown

42.0

Overall

Attack 43.6
Defense 57.1
Form 10.1
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

49.8 vs 47.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Sounders logo Sounders
D
Cincinnati (61%)
L
Austin (37%)
L
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Portland (58%)
L
Philadelphia (57%)
L
Austin (42%)
L
Portland (53%)
L
LAFC (58%)
Minnesota logo Minnesota
W
Earthquakes (38%)
L
Atlanta United (44%)
D
Salt Lake (54%)
D
San Diego (54%)
D
Whitecaps (55%)
L
Sporting KC (46%)
D
Salt Lake (49%)
L
New England (53%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cincinnati A
1 - 1 D
61%
Austin H
1 - 2 L
37%
Whitecaps H
0 - 2 L
55%
Portland A
1 - 2 L
58%
Philadelphia A
0 - 1 L
57%
Austin A
1 - 3 L
42%
Portland H
1 - 5 L
53%
LAFC A
0 - 1 L
58%
Galaxy H
0 - 2 L
44%
Earthquakes H
3 - 2 W
33%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Earthquakes A
5 - 1 W
38%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
44%
Salt Lake A
1 - 1 D
54%
San Diego H
1 - 1 D
54%
Whitecaps H
0 - 0 D
55%
Sporting KC A
1 - 2 L
46%
Salt Lake H
1 - 1 D
49%
New England A
1 - 2 L
53%
Colorado H
0 - 1 L
49%
Austin H
2 - 2 D
37%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (51.9 vs 50.7), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Minnesota leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.3 goals per game compared to Sounders's 0.8 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Defensively, Minnesota is far superior, conceding just 1.3 goals per match with 1 clean sheets, while Sounders leaks 2.1 goals per match.

Sounders has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Minnesota has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.8 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Sounders is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Minnesota is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Minnesota faces a key vulnerability: they have kept only 1 clean sheets in their last 10 matches. If Sounders can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Minnesota. In practical terms, Minnesota would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Minnesota has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.9-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Sounders

Sounders

VS
Minnesota

Minnesota

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Sounders

1W 1D 8L · 8 goals scored · 21 conceded

Minnesota

1W 5D 4L · 13 goals scored · 13 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or