Shelbourne vs Sligo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Shelbourne vs Sligo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Shelbourne
Home Team
Sligo
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Shelbourne
Draw
Sligo
Statistical Comparison
4W, 5D, 1L
2W, 2D, 6L
18 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
+3
-6
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
4W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
League Difficulty: 48.3, Opponent Quality: 51.3
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 54.0
1W / 1 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.21
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.01
Attack: 67.4, Defense: 56.1, Form: 44.9
Attack: 50.2, Defense: 30.1, Form: 20.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Shelbourne
Sligo
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.
Shelbourne has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 62.3 against considerably stronger competition than Sligo (SoS: 50.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Shelbourne leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Sligo's 1.5 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Defensively, Shelbourne holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Sligo's 2.1.
Sligo has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.5 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: Shelbourne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Sligo is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Shelbourne faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Sligo can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 19.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Shelbourne. In practical terms, Shelbourne would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Shelbourne emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (57.3 vs 37.5) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Irish Premier Division (2026-06-27). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Shelbourne
Sligo
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Shelbourne
4W 5D 1L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Sligo
2W 2D 6L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded
Popular Teams