Shkendija vs Samsunspor Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Shkendija vs Samsunspor: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Shkendija
Home Team
Samsunspor
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Shkendija
Draw
Samsunspor
Statistical Comparison
3W, 0D, 4L
5W, 2D, 3L
9 / 7 matches
18 / 10 matches
8 / 7 matches
16 / 10 matches
+1
+2
3 / 7 matches
2 / 10 matches
3 / 7 matches
9 / 10 matches
1 / 7 matches
7 / 10 matches
2W / 3 matches
3W / 4 matches
1W / 4 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 78.0, Opponent Quality: 70.1
League Difficulty: 66.6, Opponent Quality: 59.9
2W / 3 matches
1W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.3 | Diff: -0.33
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.25
Attack: 53.1, Defense: 77.6, Form: 52.7
Attack: 66.1, Defense: 51.4, Form: 55.0
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Shkendija
Samsunspor
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Shkendija has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 72.5) compared to Samsunspor (SoS: 60.1). This means Shkendija's statistics carry more weight - they've been battle-tested against quality opponents.
Samsunspor leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to Shkendija's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Shkendija's backline outperforms Samsunspor's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.6.
Shkendija has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 3 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Samsunspor has an exceptional home record with a 75% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Statistical modeling projects 2.9 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.
📈 Form Momentum: Samsunspor has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Shkendija's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
These teams have faced each other 2 times in their recent matches, adding extra spice to this rivalry. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-02-26), Samsunspor came out on top with a 4-0 victory over Shkendija. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Samsunspor secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-0 scoreline was emphatic — Samsunspor completely dominated Shkendija in that encounter, raising serious questions about Shkendija's ability to compete at this level. Shkendija will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Samsunspor will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost. In their recent UEFA Conference League encounter (2026-02-19), Samsunspor came out on top with a 0-1 victory over Shkendija. European competition results carry significant weight in assessing the balance of power between these sides. Notably, Samsunspor achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Shkendija shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Shkendija will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Samsunspor will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Shkendija
Samsunspor
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Shkendija
3W 0D 4L · 9 goals scored · 8 conceded
Samsunspor
5W 2D 3L · 18 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams