Skip to content
Compare Shrewsbury vs Chesterfield

Shrewsbury vs Chesterfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Shrewsbury vs Chesterfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Shrewsbury Shrewsbury Home Team
Chesterfield Chesterfield Away Team
Shrewsbury
32.9
L L D D L D D L D D

Last 10 Matches

Chesterfield
45.0
W L L L D L W W D W

Performance Radar

Shrewsbury
Chesterfield

Categories Won

2

Shrewsbury

4

Draw

9

Chesterfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 6D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.6

6 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

0.9

9 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-8

-8

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Davison (2 goals)
L. Bonis (5 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 5
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 3 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 7 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.0

League Difficulty: 42.5, Opponent Quality: 51.6

46.8

League Difficulty: 41.0, Opponent Quality: 50.7

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.55

Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.05

0.88

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
32.9

Attack: 19.6, Defense: 52.3, Form: 0.0

45.0

Attack: 32.3, Defense: 67.8, Form: 38.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

3
1

46-60'

1

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

1
Shrewsbury
Chesterfield
Shrewsbury

Power Rating Breakdown

32.9

Overall

Attack 19.6
Defense 52.3
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Chesterfield

Power Rating Breakdown

45.0

Overall

Attack 32.3
Defense 67.8
Form 38.7
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

42.5 vs 41.0

Opponent Quality

51.6 vs 50.7

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Shrewsbury logo Shrewsbury
L
Barnet (54%)
L
Tranmere (49%)
D
Salford (53%)
D
Hereford (61%)
L
West Brom (67%)
D
Radcliffe (39%)
D
Stafford (53%)
L
Gillingham (43%)
Chesterfield logo Chesterfield
W
Salford (51%)
L
Fleetwood (51%)
L
Fleetwood (58%)
L
Halifax (62%)
D
Notts Co (49%)
L
Notts Co (44%)
W
Swindon (39%)
W
Crewe (46%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Barnet H
1 - 3 L
54%
Tranmere A
0 - 2 L
49%
Salford A
1 - 1 D
53%
Hereford A
1 - 1 D
61%
West Brom H
1 - 4 L
67%
Radcliffe A
0 - 0 D
39%
Stafford A
0 - 0 D
53%
Gillingham A
0 - 1 L
43%
Fleetwood H
2 - 2 D
51%
Crawley A
0 - 0 D
46%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Salford A
1 - 0 W
51%
Fleetwood H
0 - 1 L
51%
Fleetwood A
0 - 1 L
58%
Halifax A
2 - 3 L
62%
Notts Co A
0 - 0 D
49%
Notts Co H
0 - 1 L
44%
Swindon A
2 - 1 W
39%
Crewe H
2 - 0 W
46%
Fleetwood A
1 - 1 D
56%
Grimsby H
2 - 1 W
51%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (48.0 vs 46.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

Chesterfield holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Shrewsbury's 0.6, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Chesterfield's backline outperforms Shrewsbury's, with 0.9 goals conceded per match versus 1.4.

Shrewsbury has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chesterfield has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 1.9 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: Shrewsbury is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Chesterfield is on the rise with 4W in last 10, while Shrewsbury shows signs of decline with 0W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 12.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for Chesterfield. In practical terms, Chesterfield would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Chesterfield has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 12.1-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury

VS
Chesterfield

Chesterfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Shrewsbury

0W 6D 4L · 6 goals scored · 14 conceded

Chesterfield

4W 2D 4L · 10 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or