Skip to content
Compare SJK vs VPS

SJK vs VPS Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare SJK vs VPS: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

SJK SJK Home Team
VPS VPS Away Team
SJK
39.9
L L D W L L L W D D

Last 10 Matches

VPS
51.8
W L W L L L W W D W

Performance Radar

SJK
VPS

Categories Won

1

SJK

4

Draw

10

VPS

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 3D, 5L

50%

5W, 1D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

+6

+6

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Kelwin (3 goals)
S. Lindholm (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 9
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

1.51

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.29

Adjusted Power Rating
39.9

Attack: 42.2, Defense: 48.7, Form: 19.5

51.8

Attack: 57.5, Defense: 57.5, Form: 47.9

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

1
2

31-45'

5
3

46-60'

2
3

61-75'

4
4

76-90+'

3
SJK
VPS
SJK

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 42.2
Defense 48.7
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3
VPS

Power Rating Breakdown

51.8

Overall

Attack 57.5
Defense 57.5
Form 47.9
Consistency 38.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

49.0 vs 46.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
SJK logo SJK
L
Lahti (54%)
L
Mariehamn (34%)
D
Gnistan (54%)
W
HJK (55%)
L
Jaro (38%)
L
KuPS (43%)
L
VPS (55%)
W
TPS (50%)
VPS logo VPS
W
Ilves (49%)
L
TPS (50%)
W
Jaro (38%)
L
Inter Turku (53%)
L
KuPS (48%)
L
HJK (60%)
W
SJK (40%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lahti H
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn A
0 - 2 L
34%
Gnistan H
2 - 2 D
54%
HJK H
3 - 0 W
55%
Jaro A
1 - 2 L
38%
KuPS H
0 - 2 L
43%
VPS A
0 - 1 L
55%
TPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Ilves A
2 - 2 D
49%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
58%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves A
1 - 0 W
49%
TPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Jaro A
3 - 1 W
38%
Inter Turku H
0 - 1 L
53%
KuPS A
1 - 3 L
48%
HJK A
1 - 2 L
60%
SJK H
1 - 0 W
40%
Mariehamn H
4 - 0 W
29%
Gnistan A
1 - 1 D
58%
Oulu H
5 - 1 W
38%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 47.4 vs 45.8), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

VPS leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.8 goals per game compared to SJK's 1.3 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

VPS has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to SJK's 1.5.

SJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

VPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: SJK is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: VPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. VPS is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while SJK shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 11.9-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 80% win probability for VPS. In practical terms, VPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward VPS, with a 11.9-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-10), VPS prevailed 1-0 against SJK. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. VPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. SJK will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. VPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

SJK

SJK

VS
VPS

VPS

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

SJK

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

VPS

5W 1D 4L · 18 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or