Sligo vs Shelbourne Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Sligo vs Shelbourne: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Sligo
Home Team
Shelbourne
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Sligo
Draw
Shelbourne
Statistical Comparison
2W, 2D, 6L
4W, 5D, 1L
15 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
-6
+3
1 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
9 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
0W / 5 matches
4W / 6 matches
2W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 54.0
League Difficulty: 48.3, Opponent Quality: 51.3
0W / 0 matches
1W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.01
Actual: 1.8 | Diff: -0.21
Attack: 50.2, Defense: 30.1, Form: 20.1
Attack: 67.4, Defense: 56.1, Form: 44.9
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Sligo
Shelbourne
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
Shelbourne has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 62.3 against considerably stronger competition than Sligo (SoS: 50.4). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
Shelbourne holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Sligo's 1.5, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Defensively, Shelbourne holds the advantage — allowing just 1.5 goals per game against Sligo's 2.1.
Sligo has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.
❄️ Form Momentum: Sligo is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📈 Form Momentum: Shelbourne has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Shelbourne faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Sligo can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 19.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Shelbourne. In practical terms, Shelbourne would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers point firmly toward Shelbourne in this contest. Their superior power rating of 57.3, compared to 37.5 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.
These two teams drew 2-2 in the Irish Premier Division (2026-06-27). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Sligo
Shelbourne
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Sligo
2W 2D 6L · 15 goals scored · 21 conceded
Shelbourne
4W 5D 1L · 18 goals scored · 15 conceded
Popular Teams