Skip to content
Compare Slough vs Chelmsford

Slough vs Chelmsford Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Slough vs Chelmsford: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Slough Slough Home Team
Chelmsford Chelmsford Away Team
Slough
26.2
W L L L D L L L D L

Last 10 Matches

Chelmsford
41.2
L W D D D W D W L L

Performance Radar

Slough
Chelmsford

Categories Won

3

Slough

3

Draw

9

Chelmsford

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
10%

1W, 2D, 7L

30%

3W, 4D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
3.0

30 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-16

-16

+1

+1

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
80%

8 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
L. Holness (2 goals)
L. Taylor (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
38.3

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 43.8

35.9

League Difficulty: 30.0, Opponent Quality: 39.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.23

1.57

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.23

Adjusted Power Rating
26.2

Attack: 41.2, Defense: 0.0, Form: 8.8

41.2

Attack: 51.5, Defense: 37.2, Form: 25.8

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

3

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

3
2

61-75'

2
6

76-90+'

7
Slough
Chelmsford
Slough

Power Rating Breakdown

26.2

Overall

Attack 41.2
Defense 0.0
Form 8.8
Consistency 74.5
Chelmsford

Power Rating Breakdown

41.2

Overall

Attack 51.5
Defense 37.2
Form 25.8
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

30.0 vs 30.0

Opponent Quality

43.8 vs 39.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Slough logo Slough
W
Dag & Red (40%)
L
Enfield T (38%)
L
Torquay (48%)
L
Chesham (48%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
L
Ebbsfleet (48%)
L
Farnborough (48%)
L
Chelmsford (45%)
Chelmsford logo Chelmsford
L
Eastbourne (24%)
W
Chesham (48%)
D
Hornchurch (58%)
D
Maidenhead (43%)
D
Dag & Red (44%)
W
Enfield T (33%)
D
Totton (38%)
W
Chippenham (43%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dag & Red H
3 - 2 W
40%
Enfield T A
2 - 5 L
38%
Torquay H
1 - 5 L
48%
Chesham A
1 - 4 L
48%
Maidenhead H
2 - 2 D
43%
Ebbsfleet A
1 - 2 L
48%
Farnborough A
0 - 2 L
48%
Chelmsford A
0 - 2 L
45%
Salisbury H
3 - 3 D
41%
Hampton & RB H
1 - 3 L
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Eastbourne H
1 - 3 L
24%
Chesham A
2 - 0 W
48%
Hornchurch A
3 - 3 D
58%
Maidenhead H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dag & Red A
3 - 3 D
44%
Enfield T H
3 - 0 W
33%
Totton H
1 - 1 D
38%
Chippenham A
1 - 0 W
43%
Farnborough A
2 - 4 L
48%
Dover H
1 - 2 L
20%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 38.3 vs 35.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Chelmsford holds the attacking edge with 1.8 goals per match versus Slough's 1.4, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Chelmsford holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.7 goals per game and recording 3 clean sheets, compared to Slough's leaky backline that surrenders 3.0 goals per match.

Slough has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chelmsford has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 4.0 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking likely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Slough is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Chelmsford faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.7 goals per match. If Slough can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 15.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Chelmsford. In practical terms, Chelmsford would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Chelmsford emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (41.2 vs 26.2) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-03-16), Chelmsford prevailed 2-0 against Slough. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Chelmsford secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. Slough will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chelmsford will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Slough

Slough

VS
Chelmsford

Chelmsford

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Slough

1W 2D 7L · 14 goals scored · 30 conceded

Chelmsford

3W 4D 3L · 18 goals scored · 17 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or