Skip to content
Compare South Korea vs Uzbekistan

South Korea vs Uzbekistan Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare South Korea vs Uzbekistan: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

South Korea South Korea Home Team
Uzbekistan Uzbekistan Away Team
South Korea
42.1
D L L L W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Uzbekistan
41.7
L W L L W L L W L W

Performance Radar

South Korea
Uzbekistan

Categories Won

8

South Korea

2

Draw

5

Uzbekistan

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

40%

4W, 0D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-6

-6

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Park Soo-Jeong (3 goals)
D. Nozimova (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.6

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.8

57.0

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 55.8

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.95

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05

1.19

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
42.1

Attack: 63.7, Defense: 25.5, Form: 28.7

41.7

Attack: 42.8, Defense: 42.8, Form: 42.8

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

6

46-60'

3

61-75'

2
4

76-90+'

1
South Korea
Uzbekistan
South Korea

Power Rating Breakdown

42.1

Overall

Attack 63.7
Defense 25.5
Form 28.7
Consistency 53.2
Uzbekistan

Power Rating Breakdown

41.7

Overall

Attack 42.8
Defense 42.8
Form 42.8
Consistency 35.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.5 vs 62.5

Opponent Quality

58.8 vs 55.8

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
South Korea logo South Korea
D
Zambia (53%)
L
Canada (67%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Japan (62%)
W
Uzbekistan (39%)
D
Australia (66%)
W
Philippines (41%)
W
Iran (37%)
Uzbekistan logo Uzbekistan
L
Thailand (87%)
W
Myanmar (75%)
L
Philippines (38%)
L
South Korea (48%)
W
Bangladesh (29%)
L
China (51%)
L
Korea DPR (59%)
W
Vietnam (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zambia H
1 - 1 D
53%
Canada A
1 - 3 L
67%
Brazil A
1 - 5 L
75%
Japan H
1 - 4 L
62%
Uzbekistan H
6 - 0 W
39%
Australia A
3 - 3 D
66%
Philippines A
3 - 0 W
41%
Iran H
3 - 0 W
37%
Netherlands A
0 - 5 L
78%
Wales H
1 - 1 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Thailand A
0 - 1 L
87%
Myanmar A
1 - 0 W
75%
Philippines H
0 - 2 L
38%
South Korea A
0 - 6 L
48%
Bangladesh A
4 - 0 W
29%
China H
0 - 3 L
51%
Korea DPR A
0 - 3 L
59%
Vietnam A
6 - 2 W
57%
Vietnam A
0 - 1 L
57%
Iran H
1 - 0 W
57%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but when we adjust for opponent quality, the picture becomes even more intriguing. Both teams have earned their statistics against comparable opposition.

Context matters here: Uzbekistan's schedule strength (SoS: 57.0) has been notably more demanding than South Korea's (SoS: 45.6), meaning their underlying stats reflect performance against higher-calibre opposition and should be weighted accordingly.

Offensively, South Korea outperforms Uzbekistan with 2.0 goals per match to 1.2, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Uzbekistan's backline outperforms South Korea's, with 1.8 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

South Korea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Uzbekistan's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-14), South Korea eliminated Uzbekistan with a 6-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and South Korea showed they can handle the pressure. South Korea secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-0 scoreline was emphatic — South Korea completely dominated Uzbekistan in that encounter, raising serious questions about Uzbekistan's ability to compete at this level. Uzbekistan will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Korea will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

South Korea

South Korea

VS
Uzbekistan

Uzbekistan

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

South Korea

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 22 conceded

Uzbekistan

4W 0D 6L · 12 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or