South Korea vs Zambia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare South Korea vs Zambia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
South Korea
Home Team
Zambia
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
South Korea
Draw
Zambia
Statistical Comparison
3W, 3D, 4L
2W, 4D, 4L
20 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
22 / 10 matches
18 / 10 matches
-2
-7
3 / 10 matches
1 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 3 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 7 matches
League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.8
League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2
0W / 3 matches
2W / 4 matches
Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05
Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.26
Attack: 63.7, Defense: 25.5, Form: 28.7
Attack: 43.3, Defense: 47.2, Form: 23.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
South Korea
Zambia
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.
Zambia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 68.0 against considerably stronger competition than South Korea (SoS: 45.6). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.
South Korea holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Zambia's 1.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.
Zambia's backline outperforms South Korea's, with 1.8 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.
South Korea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.
Zambia has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Zambia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.
💡 Why This Matters: Zambia's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.
Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.
These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals Women (2026-04-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
South Korea
Zambia
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
South Korea
3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 22 conceded
Zambia
2W 4D 4L · 11 goals scored · 18 conceded
Popular Teams