Skip to content
Compare South Korea vs Zambia

South Korea vs Zambia Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare South Korea vs Zambia: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

South Korea South Korea Home Team
Zambia Zambia Away Team
South Korea
42.1
D L L L W D W W L D

Last 10 Matches

Zambia
41.5
L D W D D L L W D L

Performance Radar

South Korea
Zambia

Categories Won

9

South Korea

2

Draw

4

Zambia

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

20%

2W, 4D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
2.0

20 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-2

-2

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
30%

3 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Park Soo-Jeong (3 goals)
B. Banda (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.6

League Difficulty: 62.5, Opponent Quality: 58.8

68.0

League Difficulty: 80.0, Opponent Quality: 67.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.95

Actual: 2.0 | Diff: +0.05

1.36

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: -0.26

Adjusted Power Rating
42.1

Attack: 63.7, Defense: 25.5, Form: 28.7

41.5

Attack: 43.3, Defense: 47.2, Form: 23.6

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

6

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

4

76-90+'

South Korea
Zambia
South Korea

Power Rating Breakdown

42.1

Overall

Attack 63.7
Defense 25.5
Form 28.7
Consistency 53.2
Zambia

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 43.3
Defense 47.2
Form 23.6
Consistency 64.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

62.5 vs 80.0

Opponent Quality

58.8 vs 67.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 50%
South Korea logo South Korea
D
Zambia (53%)
L
Canada (67%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Japan (62%)
W
Uzbekistan (39%)
D
Australia (66%)
W
Philippines (41%)
W
Iran (37%)
Zambia logo Zambia
L
Algeria (69%)
D
Algeria (69%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)
D
Kenya (55%)
D
South Korea (62%)
L
Brazil (75%)
L
Canada (67%)
W
Zimbabwe (71%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Zambia H
1 - 1 D
53%
Canada A
1 - 3 L
67%
Brazil A
1 - 5 L
75%
Japan H
1 - 4 L
62%
Uzbekistan H
6 - 0 W
39%
Australia A
3 - 3 D
66%
Philippines A
3 - 0 W
41%
Iran H
3 - 0 W
37%
Netherlands A
0 - 5 L
78%
Wales H
1 - 1 D
70%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Algeria A
0 - 1 L
69%
Algeria A
1 - 1 D
69%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 0 W
71%
Kenya H
1 - 1 D
55%
South Korea A
1 - 1 D
62%
Brazil A
1 - 6 L
75%
Canada A
0 - 4 L
67%
Zimbabwe H
3 - 1 W
71%
Malawi A
1 - 1 D
54%
South Africa A
0 - 2 L
79%

AI Analysis

Two well-matched sides make for a compelling statistical comparison here. Surface-level metrics only scratch the surface — once we factor in strength of schedule, the analysis gains real depth. The numbers both teams have posted reflect performances against broadly similar competition.

Zambia has earned their numbers the hard way, posting a SoS of 68.0 against considerably stronger competition than South Korea (SoS: 45.6). Their figures deserve greater analytical credence as a result — forged against genuinely difficult opponents.

South Korea holds the attacking edge with 2.0 goals per match versus Zambia's 1.1, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Zambia's backline outperforms South Korea's, with 1.8 goals conceded per match versus 2.2.

South Korea has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Zambia has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Zambia is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: In matches this evenly balanced, the deciding factor often comes down to set pieces and individual errors. Both teams should be wary of complacency in a match where neither side has a clear edge.

💡 Why This Matters: Zambia's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

Statistically, there is very little to choose between these two teams. The numbers point to an evenly contested match where fine details and in-game decisions will likely prove decisive.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the Internationals Women (2026-04-18). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

South Korea

South Korea

VS
Zambia

Zambia

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

South Korea

3W 3D 4L · 20 goals scored · 22 conceded

Zambia

2W 4D 4L · 11 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or