Skip to content
Compare South Shields vs Macclesfield

South Shields vs Macclesfield Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare South Shields vs Macclesfield: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

South Shields South Shields Home Team
Macclesfield Macclesfield Away Team
South Shields
41.3
L L W L D W W L D W

Last 10 Matches

Macclesfield
37.0
W D D L W L W L L W

Performance Radar

South Shields
Macclesfield

Categories Won

6

South Shields

4

Draw

5

Macclesfield

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.6

16 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.8

18 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
P. Blackett (6 goals)
J. Kay (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 15
Home Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

67%

2W / 3 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

29%

2W / 7 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
28.8

League Difficulty: 31.5, Opponent Quality: 46.4

29.7

League Difficulty: 34.5, Opponent Quality: 45.3

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.2

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.4

1.59

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
41.3

Attack: 42.0, Defense: 49.9, Form: 31.5

37.0

Attack: 42.5, Defense: 31.9, Form: 31.9

Goal Timing Analysis

4

0-15'

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

3

46-60'

1
3

61-75'

2
1

76-90+'

4
South Shields
Macclesfield
South Shields

Power Rating Breakdown

41.3

Overall

Attack 42.0
Defense 49.9
Form 31.5
Consistency 44.8
Macclesfield

Power Rating Breakdown

37.0

Overall

Attack 42.5
Defense 31.9
Form 31.9
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

31.5 vs 34.5

Opponent Quality

46.4 vs 45.3

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
South Shields logo South Shields
L
Harrogate (48%)
L
Kidderminster (67%)
W
Buxton (55%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
D
Bedford (44%)
W
Macclesfield (39%)
W
Radcliffe (30%)
L
Darlington (25%)
Macclesfield logo Macclesfield
W
Altrincham (48%)
D
Warrington (44%)
D
Leek (47%)
L
Kidderminster (72%)
W
Chester (46%)
L
Radcliffe (30%)
W
Southport (44%)
L
Spennymoor (40%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Harrogate H
1 - 2 L
48%
Kidderminster H
0 - 2 L
67%
Buxton H
1 - 0 W
55%
Kidderminster A
0 - 1 L
72%
Bedford H
1 - 1 D
44%
Macclesfield H
4 - 1 W
39%
Radcliffe A
5 - 2 W
30%
Darlington H
0 - 1 L
25%
Spennymoor A
1 - 1 D
45%
Alfreton H
3 - 0 W
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Altrincham A
5 - 2 W
48%
Warrington A
2 - 2 D
44%
Leek A
1 - 1 D
47%
Kidderminster A
1 - 3 L
72%
Chester H
2 - 1 W
46%
Radcliffe A
0 - 1 L
30%
Southport H
2 - 1 W
44%
Spennymoor H
0 - 2 L
40%
South Shields A
1 - 4 L
47%
Merthyr A
2 - 1 W
35%

AI Analysis

On paper, these teams are closely aligned, and the data backs that up. Raw statistics can be misleading without context, but strength-of-opponent adjustments reinforce just how competitive this matchup is. Neither side has padded their numbers against weak opposition.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 28.8 vs 29.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with South Shields averaging 1.6 and Macclesfield averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Defensively, South Shields holds the advantage — allowing just 1.1 goals per game against Macclesfield's 1.8.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

💡 Why This Matters: Macclesfield's superior Strength of Schedule means their statistics were earned against tougher opponents. A team that performs well against strong opposition is more likely to maintain that level in any given match.

In their recent National League N / S match (2026-04-14), South Shields prevailed 4-1 against Macclesfield. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. South Shields secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 4-1 scoreline was emphatic — South Shields completely dominated Macclesfield in that encounter, raising serious questions about Macclesfield's ability to compete at this level. Macclesfield will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. South Shields will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

South Shields

South Shields

VS
Macclesfield

Macclesfield

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

South Shields

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 11 conceded

Macclesfield

4W 2D 4L · 16 goals scored · 18 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or