Sporting vs Bodø/Glimt Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Sporting vs Bodø/Glimt: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Sporting
Home Team
Bodø/Glimt
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Sporting
Draw
Bodø/Glimt
Statistical Comparison
6W, 3D, 1L
8W, 1D, 1L
29 / 10 matches
28 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
+21
+23
4 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
5W / 7 matches
5W / 6 matches
1W / 3 matches
3W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 70.6, Opponent Quality: 61.0
League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 44.0
0W / 2 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 2.9 | Diff: -0.24
Actual: 2.8 | Diff: +0.36
Attack: 96.3, Defense: 73.0, Form: 59.8
Attack: 90.0, Defense: 80.3, Form: 77.1
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Sporting
Bodø/Glimt
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (49.6 vs 46.4), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
Sporting (2.9 goals per match) and Bodø/Glimt (2.8 goals per match) present comparable offensive threats, making this an evenly contested attacking matchup.
Defensively, Bodø/Glimt holds the advantage — allowing just 0.5 goals per game against Sporting's 0.8.
Bodø/Glimt has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Bodø/Glimt has an exceptional home record with a 83% win rate at their home ground. When playing at home, they become significantly more dangerous.
Bodø/Glimt is a strong road performer with a 75% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.5 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Sporting has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.1 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
🔥 Form Momentum: Bodø/Glimt is in scorching form, winning 8 of their last 10 matches with 28 goals scored. This level of consistency is difficult to sustain but devastating while it lasts.
📊 Key Trend: Both teams are on upward trajectories. Sporting has won 6 of their last 5, while Bodø/Glimt has won 8. This clash of momentum makes the outcome particularly unpredictable.
💡 Why This Matters: The 6.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Bodø/Glimt. In practical terms, Bodø/Glimt would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Bodø/Glimt, with a 6.2-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Sporting
Bodø/Glimt
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Sporting
6W 3D 1L · 29 goals scored · 8 conceded
Bodø/Glimt
8W 1D 1L · 28 goals scored · 5 conceded
Popular Teams