Skip to content
Compare Standard vs Jaro

Standard vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
Standard
54.5
L W D W W D L W L W

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
27.9
W L D L L L W L L L

Performance Radar

Standard
Jaro

Categories Won

10

Standard

2

Draw

3

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
50%

5W, 2D, 3L

20%

2W, 1D, 7L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.1

11 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.7

27 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+6

+6

-16

-16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
70%

7 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
70%

7 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Nkada (3 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 3
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
80%

4W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
49.6

League Difficulty: 50.8, Opponent Quality: 48.8

48.7

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 51.2

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.53

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.17

1.08

Actual: 1.1 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
54.5

Attack: 56.4, Defense: 63.1, Form: 49.8

27.9

Attack: 36.2, Defense: 9.9, Form: 19.7

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

4
4

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2
4

61-75'

6

76-90+'

1
Standard
Jaro
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

54.5

Overall

Attack 56.4
Defense 63.1
Form 49.8
Consistency 45.7
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

27.9

Overall

Attack 36.2
Defense 9.9
Form 19.7
Consistency 57.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.8 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

48.8 vs 51.2

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
L
Charleroi (51%)
W
Westerlo (47%)
D
Genk (52%)
W
OHL (33%)
W
Antwerp (47%)
D
Genk (56%)
L
Antwerp (42%)
W
Charleroi (56%)
Jaro logo Jaro
W
Ilves (46%)
L
TPS (46%)
D
Gnistan (56%)
L
Ilves (51%)
L
HJK (49%)
L
Oulu (54%)
W
Mariehamn (22%)
L
KuPS (67%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
51%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
47%
Genk H
0 - 0 D
52%
OHL H
2 - 1 W
33%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
47%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
56%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
42%
Charleroi A
2 - 1 W
56%
Westerlo H
1 - 2 L
54%
OHL A
3 - 1 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
46%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
46%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
56%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
51%
HJK H
2 - 5 L
49%
Oulu A
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
22%
KuPS A
0 - 3 L
67%
Gnistan A
0 - 5 L
60%
Inter Turku A
0 - 2 L
61%

AI Analysis

When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.6 vs 48.7), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Standard holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Jaro's 1.1, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Defensively, Standard is far superior, conceding just 1.1 goals per match with 2 clean sheets, while Jaro leaks 2.7 per match.

Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Standard is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.3 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (54.5 vs 27.9) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Standard

5W 2D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded

Jaro

2W 1D 7L · 11 goals scored · 27 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or