Standard vs Napredak Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Standard vs Napredak: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Standard
Home Team
Napredak
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Standard
Draw
Napredak
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
1W, 1D, 8L
17 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
11 / 10 matches
19 / 10 matches
+6
-13
2 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
4W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 50.8, Opponent Quality: 48.8
League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 55.9
0W / 0 matches
0W / 0 matches
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.17
Actual: 0.6 | Diff: +0.03
Attack: 56.4, Defense: 63.1, Form: 49.8
Attack: 21.1, Defense: 38.7, Form: 10.6
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Standard
Napredak
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule filter reveals a much clearer picture.
Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 49.6 vs 55.5), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.
Standard's attack is on another level, averaging 1.7 goals per match with T. Nkada leading the charge with 3 goals. Napredak manages just 0.6 per match.
Standard has the defensive edge, conceding 1.1 per match compared to Napredak's 1.9.
Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Napredak has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Standard is a strong road team with a 80% away win rate, suggesting they can perform regardless of venue.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.6 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being possible.
Standard emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (54.5 vs 30.4) and better performance against quality opposition, they should control the game. However, football always has room for surprises.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
0
:
0
|
0'
Standard
Napredak
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Standard
5W 2D 3L · 17 goals scored · 11 conceded
Napredak
1W 1D 8L · 6 goals scored · 19 conceded
Popular Teams