Skip to content
Compare Standard vs OHL

Standard vs OHL Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs OHL: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
OHL OHL Away Team
Standard
46.2
W L L L W D W W D L

Last 10 Matches

OHL
39.7
D L W L D W L D L L

Performance Radar

Standard
OHL

Categories Won

7

Standard

3

Draw

5

OHL

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

-3

-3

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
R. Saïd (3 goals)
A. Traoré (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
46.6

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.7

47.3

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 48.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.12

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.18

1.76

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.06

Adjusted Power Rating
46.2

Attack: 41.9, Defense: 61.2, Form: 38.6

39.7

Attack: 55.1, Defense: 32.4, Form: 19.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

1
4

31-45'

4
2

46-60'

1
2

61-75'

2

76-90+'

Standard
OHL
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

46.2

Overall

Attack 41.9
Defense 61.2
Form 38.6
Consistency 44.8
OHL

Power Rating Breakdown

39.7

Overall

Attack 55.1
Defense 32.4
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

47.7 vs 48.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
W
Seraing (33%)
L
Juventus (55%)
L
Dunkerque (47%)
L
Charleroi (54%)
W
Westerlo (45%)
D
Genk (45%)
W
OHL (39%)
W
Antwerp (57%)
OHL logo OHL
D
Heerenveen (54%)
L
Club NXT (49%)
W
Lommel (40%)
L
Genk (45%)
D
Charleroi (58%)
W
Antwerp (52%)
L
Standard (52%)
D
Westerlo (45%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Seraing H
2 - 1 W
33%
Juventus H
0 - 1 L
55%
Dunkerque A
0 - 2 L
47%
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
54%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
45%
Genk H
0 - 0 D
45%
OHL H
2 - 1 W
39%
Antwerp A
5 - 0 W
57%
Genk A
1 - 1 D
50%
Antwerp H
1 - 2 L
52%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Heerenveen A
4 - 4 D
54%
Club NXT A
0 - 3 L
49%
Lommel H
5 - 1 W
40%
Genk H
0 - 2 L
45%
Charleroi A
1 - 1 D
58%
Antwerp H
3 - 0 W
52%
Standard A
1 - 2 L
52%
Westerlo A
3 - 3 D
45%
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
54%
Westerlo H
0 - 2 L
40%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 46.6 vs 47.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

OHL holds the attacking edge with 1.7 goals per match versus Standard's 1.3, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

The numbers tell a compelling defensive story for Standard — 1.1 goals conceded per game and 2 clean sheets put them well ahead of OHL, who give up 2.0 goals per match at the other end.

Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

OHL has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 3.1 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being possible.

❄️ Form Momentum: OHL is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 6.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 66% win probability for Standard. In practical terms, Standard would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Standard, with a 6.5-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In their recent Belgian First Division A match (2026-05-08), Standard prevailed 2-1 against OHL. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Standard secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 2-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. OHL will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Standard will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
OHL

OHL

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Standard

4W 2D 4L · 13 goals scored · 11 conceded

OHL

2W 3D 5L · 17 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or