Skip to content
Compare Standard vs Westerlo

Standard vs Westerlo Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Standard vs Westerlo: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Standard Standard Home Team
Westerlo Westerlo Away Team
Standard
41.5
W D D L W W L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Westerlo
32.4
L L L L D W D L L W

Performance Radar

Standard
Westerlo

Categories Won

8

Standard

3

Draw

4

Westerlo

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-10

-10

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
S. Drammeh (2 goals)
N. Bassette (1 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
Home Win Rate
43%

3W / 7 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

1W / 3 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.2

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 45.4

46.5

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 47.5

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.17

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: +0.03

0.98

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
41.5

Attack: 38.1, Defense: 47.6, Form: 38.1

32.4

Attack: 32.2, Defense: 32.2, Form: 19.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

4
2

16-30'

1

31-45'

2

46-60'

3

61-75'

76-90+'

1
Standard
Westerlo
Standard

Power Rating Breakdown

41.5

Overall

Attack 38.1
Defense 47.6
Form 38.1
Consistency 44.8
Westerlo

Power Rating Breakdown

32.4

Overall

Attack 32.2
Defense 32.2
Form 19.3
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

45.4 vs 47.5

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Standard logo Standard
W
La Louvière (39%)
D
Mechelen (37%)
D
Cercle Brugge (44%)
L
Viktoria Köln (51%)
W
Bielefeld (51%)
W
Seraing (39%)
L
Juventus (55%)
L
Dunkerque (48%)
Westerlo logo Westerlo
L
Lommel (45%)
L
Genk (48%)
L
R. Union SG (56%)
L
Samsunspor (51%)
D
Kifisia (43%)
W
Dunkerque (48%)
D
Fayha (27%)
L
Antwerp (57%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
La Louvière H
2 - 0 W
39%
Mechelen A
3 - 3 D
37%
Cercle Brugge H
2 - 2 D
44%
Viktoria Köln H
0 - 3 L
51%
Bielefeld H
1 - 0 W
51%
Seraing H
2 - 1 W
39%
Juventus H
0 - 1 L
55%
Dunkerque A
0 - 2 L
48%
Charleroi H
0 - 2 L
51%
Westerlo A
2 - 1 W
39%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lommel A
0 - 4 L
45%
Genk A
2 - 3 L
48%
R. Union SG H
1 - 5 L
56%
Samsunspor H
1 - 2 L
51%
Kifisia H
1 - 1 D
43%
Dunkerque A
3 - 1 W
48%
Fayha H
0 - 0 D
27%
Antwerp A
0 - 2 L
57%
Standard H
1 - 2 L
44%
Charleroi A
1 - 0 W
56%

AI Analysis

While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.2 vs 46.5), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Standard averaging 1.2 and Westerlo averaging 1.0 goals per match.

Standard's backline outperforms Westerlo's, with 1.5 goals conceded per match versus 2.0.

Standard has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Westerlo has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.9 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking possible given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Westerlo is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Standard faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.5 goals per match. If Westerlo can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 9.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Standard. In practical terms, Standard would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

Standard has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 9.1-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Belgian First Division A match (2026-05-19), Standard prevailed 1-2 against Westerlo. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, Standard achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Westerlo shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 1-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Westerlo will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Standard will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Standard

Standard

VS
Westerlo

Westerlo

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Standard

4W 2D 4L · 12 goals scored · 15 conceded

Westerlo

2W 2D 6L · 10 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or