Skip to content
Compare Jinmen Tiger vs Peng City

Jinmen Tiger vs Peng City Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Jinmen Tiger vs Peng City: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Jinmen Tiger Jinmen Tiger Home Team
Peng City Peng City Away Team
Jinmen Tiger
50.0
W W W L W D L L D D

Last 10 Matches

Peng City
39.5
L L W L L W W D L L

Performance Radar

Jinmen Tiger
Peng City

Categories Won

7

Jinmen Tiger

3

Draw

5

Peng City

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

30%

3W, 1D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.8

8 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+5

+5

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
Xadas (4 goals)
Wesley (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
47.9

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 47.9

48.2

League Difficulty: 48.0, Opponent Quality: 48.4

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

1.48

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.02

Adjusted Power Rating
50.0

Attack: 42.4, Defense: 71.8, Form: 39.2

39.5

Attack: 49.1, Defense: 36.0, Form: 29.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

4
2

31-45'

1
1

46-60'

1
1

61-75'

2
6

76-90+'

5
Jinmen Tiger
Peng City
Jinmen Tiger

Power Rating Breakdown

50.0

Overall

Attack 42.4
Defense 71.8
Form 39.2
Consistency 50.5
Peng City

Power Rating Breakdown

39.5

Overall

Attack 49.1
Defense 36.0
Form 29.5
Consistency 46.0

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

48.0 vs 48.0

Opponent Quality

47.9 vs 48.4

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Jinmen Tiger logo Jinmen Tiger
W
Hainiu (39%)
W
Shenhua (44%)
W
Peng City (40%)
L
Tonglianglong (47%)
W
Yingbo (39%)
D
Port (55%)
L
Henan (49%)
L
Rongcheng (52%)
Peng City logo Peng City
L
Yukun (54%)
L
Three Towns (50%)
W
West Coast (56%)
L
Jinmen Tiger (56%)
L
Rongcheng (52%)
W
Hainiu (34%)
W
Shenhua (44%)
D
Yingbo (39%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Hainiu A
2 - 0 W
39%
Shenhua A
2 - 0 W
44%
Peng City H
3 - 0 W
40%
Tonglianglong A
0 - 1 L
47%
Yingbo H
1 - 0 W
39%
Port A
1 - 1 D
55%
Henan H
1 - 2 L
49%
Rongcheng H
1 - 2 L
52%
Zhejiang A
1 - 1 D
53%
West Coast A
1 - 1 D
61%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Yukun A
3 - 4 L
54%
Three Towns A
0 - 2 L
50%
West Coast H
3 - 0 W
56%
Jinmen Tiger A
0 - 3 L
56%
Rongcheng H
2 - 3 L
52%
Hainiu H
3 - 2 W
34%
Shenhua A
2 - 1 W
44%
Yingbo H
1 - 1 D
39%
Henan A
0 - 1 L
54%
Taishan H
1 - 2 L
45%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (47.9 vs 48.2), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

The attacking output of Jinmen Tiger and Peng City is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.3 and 1.5 goals per game respectively.

Defensively, Jinmen Tiger is far superior, conceding just 0.8 goals per match with 4 clean sheets, while Peng City leaks 1.9 goals per match.

Jinmen Tiger has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Peng City has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.8 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Jinmen Tiger has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.5-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for Jinmen Tiger. In practical terms, Jinmen Tiger would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Jinmen Tiger has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.5-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Chinese Super League match (2026-07-04), Jinmen Tiger prevailed 3-0 against Peng City. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Jinmen Tiger secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Jinmen Tiger completely dominated Peng City in that encounter, raising serious questions about Peng City's ability to compete at this level. Peng City will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Jinmen Tiger will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Jinmen Tiger

Jinmen Tiger

VS
Peng City

Peng City

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Jinmen Tiger

4W 3D 3L · 13 goals scored · 8 conceded

Peng City

3W 1D 6L · 15 goals scored · 19 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or