Skip to content
Compare Toronto vs Cincinnati

Toronto vs Cincinnati Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Toronto vs Cincinnati: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Toronto Toronto Home Team
Cincinnati Cincinnati Away Team
Toronto
41.0
L L L D L D D D W W

Last 10 Matches

Cincinnati
52.3
W D L D W W D D D L

Performance Radar

Toronto
Cincinnati

Categories Won

2

Toronto

3

Draw

10

Cincinnati

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
20%

2W, 4D, 4L

30%

3W, 5D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.8

18 / 10 matches

2.9

29 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.2

22 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-4

-4

+3

+3

Clean Sheet
0%

0 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
80%

8 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
100%

10 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
J. Sargent (3 goals)
Evander (9 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 15
1st Half: 13 / 2nd Half: 16
Home Win Rate
25%

2W / 8 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 2 matches

17%

1W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.5

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 50.8

54.2

League Difficulty: 55.0, Opponent Quality: 53.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.75

Actual: 1.8 | Diff: +0.05

2.73

Actual: 2.9 | Diff: +0.17

Adjusted Power Rating
41.0

Attack: 61.5, Defense: 27.3, Form: 20.5

52.3

Attack: 100, Defense: 13.9, Form: 31.3

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

8
3

46-60'

6
4

61-75'

3
8

76-90+'

9
Toronto
Cincinnati
Toronto

Power Rating Breakdown

41.0

Overall

Attack 61.5
Defense 27.3
Form 20.5
Consistency 64.0
Cincinnati

Power Rating Breakdown

52.3

Overall

Attack 100
Defense 13.9
Form 31.3
Consistency 62.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

55.0 vs 55.0

Opponent Quality

50.8 vs 53.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Toronto logo Toronto
L
Chicago (68%)
L
Charlotte (51%)
L
Inter Miami (64%)
D
Earthquakes (63%)
L
Atlanta United (40%)
D
Philadelphia (40%)
D
Austin (40%)
D
Cincinnati (53%)
Cincinnati logo Cincinnati
W
Orlando (42%)
D
San Diego (44%)
L
Inter Miami (64%)
D
Charlotte (51%)
W
Chicago (68%)
W
New York (51%)
D
NYCFC (48%)
D
Chicago (63%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Chicago A
1 - 2 L
68%
Charlotte A
1 - 3 L
51%
Inter Miami H
2 - 4 L
64%
Earthquakes H
1 - 1 D
63%
Atlanta United H
1 - 2 L
40%
Philadelphia H
3 - 3 D
40%
Austin H
3 - 3 D
40%
Cincinnati H
1 - 1 D
53%
Colorado H
3 - 2 W
39%
Columbus H
2 - 1 W
50%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Orlando H
6 - 2 W
42%
San Diego A
3 - 3 D
44%
Inter Miami H
3 - 5 L
64%
Charlotte A
2 - 2 D
51%
Chicago A
3 - 2 W
68%
New York H
2 - 0 W
51%
NYCFC A
4 - 4 D
48%
Chicago H
3 - 3 D
63%
Toronto A
1 - 1 D
49%
New York A
2 - 4 L
56%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 52.5 vs 54.2), making the raw statistics a reliable basis for comparison.

Cincinnati's attack is on another level, averaging 2.9 goals per match with Evander leading the charge with 9 goals. Toronto manages just 1.8 per match.

Toronto has the defensive edge, conceding 2.2 per match compared to Cincinnati's 2.6.

Toronto has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Cincinnati has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 4.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Cincinnati has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 11.3 point power rating difference suggests a competitive match where small details could decide the outcome.

These two teams drew 1-1 in the US Major League Soccer (2026-04-11). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Toronto

Toronto

VS
Cincinnati

Cincinnati

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Toronto

2W 4D 4L · 18 goals scored · 22 conceded

Cincinnati

3W 5D 2L · 29 goals scored · 26 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or