Skip to content
Compare TPS vs Jaro

TPS vs Jaro Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare TPS vs Jaro: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

TPS TPS Home Team
Jaro Jaro Away Team
TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

Jaro
30.8
L L L L W D W L D L

Performance Radar

TPS
Jaro

Categories Won

10

TPS

4

Draw

1

Jaro

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

20%

2W, 2D, 6L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

0.8

8 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

2.0

20 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-12

-12

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
H. Sjögrell (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 2
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

33%

2W / 6 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

48.1

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 50.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

0.68

Actual: 0.8 | Diff: +0.12

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

30.8

Attack: 26.2, Defense: 32.7, Form: 19.6

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

2

16-30'

2
3

31-45'

4
5

46-60'

1

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

TPS
Jaro
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5
Jaro

Power Rating Breakdown

30.8

Overall

Attack 26.2
Defense 32.7
Form 19.6
Consistency 59.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.3 vs 50.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)
Jaro logo Jaro
L
Oulu (38%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
VPS (50%)
L
Lahti (59%)
W
SJK (40%)
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
Ilves (44%)
L
TPS (54%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Oulu H
0 - 1 L
38%
HJK A
0 - 3 L
60%
VPS H
1 - 3 L
50%
Lahti A
0 - 2 L
59%
SJK H
2 - 1 W
40%
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
Ilves H
2 - 1 W
44%
TPS A
2 - 3 L
54%
Gnistan H
1 - 1 D
54%
Ilves A
0 - 5 L
49%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.8 vs 48.1), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Offensively, TPS outperforms Jaro with 1.5 goals per match to 0.8, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

TPS holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.1 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Jaro's leaky backline that surrenders 2.0 goals per match.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Jaro has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Statistical modeling projects 2.7 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Jaro is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.8-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for TPS. In practical terms, TPS would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers point firmly toward TPS in this contest. Their superior power rating of 48.6, compared to 30.8 for the opposition, reflects a meaningful edge across the metrics that matter most when projecting an outcome.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-06-27), TPS prevailed 3-2 against Jaro. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. TPS secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 3-2 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Jaro will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. TPS will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

TPS

TPS

VS
Jaro

Jaro

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

Jaro

2W 2D 6L · 8 goals scored · 20 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or