Skip to content
Compare TPS vs SJK

TPS vs SJK Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare TPS vs SJK: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

TPS TPS Home Team
SJK SJK Away Team
TPS
48.6
D W D W L L W L W D

Last 10 Matches

SJK
39.9
L L D W L L L W D D

Performance Radar

TPS
SJK

Categories Won

10

TPS

3

Draw

2

SJK

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 3D, 3L

20%

2W, 3D, 5L

Goals Scored / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.3

13 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.1

11 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+4

+4

-2

-2

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Muzaci (5 goals)
Kelwin (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 9 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

40%

2W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.8

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 46.3

47.4

League Difficulty: 45.0, Opponent Quality: 49.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.33

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.17

1.26

Actual: 1.3 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
48.6

Attack: 47.9, Defense: 60.7, Form: 38.3

39.9

Attack: 42.2, Defense: 48.7, Form: 19.5

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

3

31-45'

2
5

46-60'

3

61-75'

3
3

76-90+'

4
TPS
SJK
TPS

Power Rating Breakdown

48.6

Overall

Attack 47.9
Defense 60.7
Form 38.3
Consistency 50.5
SJK

Power Rating Breakdown

39.9

Overall

Attack 42.2
Defense 48.7
Form 19.5
Consistency 61.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

45.0 vs 45.0

Opponent Quality

46.3 vs 49.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
TPS logo TPS
D
Inter Turku (53%)
W
VPS (55%)
D
KuPS (48%)
W
Mariehamn (29%)
L
HJK (60%)
L
Ilves (44%)
W
Oulu (38%)
L
SJK (44%)
SJK logo SJK
L
Lahti (54%)
L
Mariehamn (34%)
D
Gnistan (54%)
W
HJK (55%)
L
Jaro (38%)
L
KuPS (43%)
L
VPS (55%)
W
TPS (50%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Inter Turku H
0 - 0 D
53%
VPS A
3 - 1 W
55%
KuPS A
1 - 1 D
48%
Mariehamn H
3 - 0 W
29%
HJK A
0 - 1 L
60%
Ilves H
1 - 3 L
44%
Oulu H
3 - 0 W
38%
SJK A
1 - 3 L
44%
Jaro H
3 - 2 W
33%
Lahti A
0 - 0 D
59%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Lahti H
1 - 2 L
54%
Mariehamn A
0 - 2 L
34%
Gnistan H
2 - 2 D
54%
HJK H
3 - 0 W
55%
Jaro A
1 - 2 L
38%
KuPS H
0 - 2 L
43%
VPS A
0 - 1 L
55%
TPS H
3 - 1 W
50%
Ilves A
2 - 2 D
49%
Inter Turku A
1 - 1 D
58%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 45.8 vs 47.4), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

The attacking output of TPS and SJK is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.5 and 1.3 goals per game respectively.

TPS's backline outperforms SJK's, with 1.1 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.

TPS has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

SJK has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: TPS has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.5 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: SJK is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.7-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 72% win probability for TPS. In practical terms, TPS would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

While TPS holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 8.7-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

In their recent Finnish Veikkausliiga match (2026-07-04), SJK prevailed 3-1 against TPS. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. SJK secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. TPS will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. SJK will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

TPS

TPS

VS
SJK

SJK

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

TPS

4W 3D 3L · 15 goals scored · 11 conceded

SJK

2W 3D 5L · 13 goals scored · 15 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or