Skip to content
Compare Tranent vs Broxburn Ath.

Tranent vs Broxburn Ath. Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Tranent vs Broxburn Ath.: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Tranent Tranent Home Team
Broxburn Ath. Broxburn Ath. Away Team
Tranent
51.0
W W W W L D L D W W

Last 10 Matches

Broxburn Ath.
33.6
D W W L D L D L D D

Performance Radar

Tranent
Broxburn Ath.

Categories Won

9

Tranent

2

Draw

4

Broxburn Ath.

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
60%

6W, 2D, 2L

20%

2W, 5D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.7

17 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

2.3

23 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+10

+10

-7

-7

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

20%

2 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
60%

6 / 10 matches

80%

8 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
G. McGarry (5 goals)
Q. Mitchell (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
29.8

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 33.0

34.6

League Difficulty: 25.0, Opponent Quality: 41.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.21

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: +0.49

1.26

Actual: 1.6 | Diff: +0.34

Adjusted Power Rating
51.0

Attack: 45.2, Defense: 61.2, Form: 47.9

33.6

Attack: 45.1, Defense: 19.7, Form: 16.9

Goal Timing Analysis

2

0-15'

1
4

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

2
7

46-60'

6
1

61-75'

2
2

76-90+'

4
Tranent
Broxburn Ath.
Tranent

Power Rating Breakdown

51.0

Overall

Attack 45.2
Defense 61.2
Form 47.9
Consistency 52.0
Broxburn Ath.

Power Rating Breakdown

33.6

Overall

Attack 45.1
Defense 19.7
Form 16.9
Consistency 67.3

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

25.0 vs 25.0

Opponent Quality

33.0 vs 41.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Tranent logo Tranent
W
East Stirling (35%)
W
Stirling Unv (17%)
W
Linlithgow (38%)
W
Broxburn Ath. (33%)
L
Braves (48%)
D
Berwick (40%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)
D
Bo'ness Utd (38%)
Broxburn Ath. logo Broxburn Ath.
D
Dunipace (25%)
W
Cowdenbeath (39%)
W
Lochee Utd (31%)
L
Tranent (55%)
D
Bonnyrigg RA (48%)
L
Clydebank (63%)
D
Cumbernauld C. (38%)
L
Linlithgow (38%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
East Stirling A
3 - 0 W
35%
Stirling Unv A
2 - 1 W
17%
Linlithgow H
1 - 0 W
38%
Broxburn Ath. H
3 - 0 W
33%
Braves A
0 - 3 L
48%
Berwick A
0 - 0 D
40%
Linlithgow H
0 - 1 L
38%
Bo'ness Utd H
1 - 1 D
38%
Gala H
2 - 1 W
26%
Stirling Unv A
5 - 0 W
17%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Dunipace A
2 - 2 D
25%
Cowdenbeath A
2 - 0 W
39%
Lochee Utd H
3 - 0 W
31%
Tranent A
0 - 3 L
55%
Bonnyrigg RA H
2 - 2 D
48%
Clydebank A
0 - 4 L
63%
Cumbernauld C. H
3 - 3 D
38%
Linlithgow H
1 - 6 L
38%
Braves A
1 - 1 D
48%
Strollers H
2 - 2 D
25%

AI Analysis

Raw output from both teams looks comparable at first glance, yet once we account for Strength of Schedule, a clear hierarchy emerges. The favorite has repeatedly risen to the challenge against higher-caliber opponents, underlining a genuine quality advantage.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 29.8 vs 34.6), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Both teams are evenly matched in attack, with Tranent averaging 1.7 and Broxburn Ath. averaging 1.6 goals per match.

Tranent holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 0.7 goals per game and recording 5 clean sheets, compared to Broxburn Ath.'s leaky backline that surrenders 2.3 goals per match.

Tranent has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Broxburn Ath. has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Tranent is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.1 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at possible based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: Tranent has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.0 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

❄️ Form Momentum: Broxburn Ath. is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Tranent is on the rise with 6W in last 10, while Broxburn Ath. shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.

💡 Why This Matters: The 17.4-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Tranent. In practical terms, Tranent would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Based on the available data, Tranent holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 51.0 against 33.6 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.

In their recent Highland / Lowland match (2026-04-18), Tranent prevailed 3-0 against Broxburn Ath.. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Tranent secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 3-0 scoreline was emphatic — Tranent completely dominated Broxburn Ath. in that encounter, raising serious questions about Broxburn Ath.'s ability to compete at this level. Broxburn Ath. will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Tranent will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Tranent

Tranent

VS
Broxburn Ath.

Broxburn Ath.

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Tranent

6W 2D 2L · 17 goals scored · 7 conceded

Broxburn Ath.

2W 5D 3L · 16 goals scored · 23 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or