Skip to content
Compare Tromsø vs Fredrikstad

Tromsø vs Fredrikstad Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Tromsø vs Fredrikstad: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Tromsø Tromsø Home Team
Fredrikstad Fredrikstad Away Team
Tromsø
44.2
D D L W D L W W D W

Last 10 Matches

Fredrikstad
40.3
W D W L L L L D W W

Performance Radar

Tromsø
Fredrikstad

Categories Won

5

Tromsø

4

Draw

6

Fredrikstad

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 4D, 2L

40%

4W, 2D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.5

15 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.3

13 / 10 matches

1.6

16 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

-1

-1

Clean Sheet
50%

5 / 10 matches

0%

0 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
30%

3 / 10 matches

90%

9 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Nyhammer (2 goals)
R. Shein (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 6
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
50%

3W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
25%

1W / 4 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
48.6

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 47.6

36.8

League Difficulty: 50.0, Opponent Quality: 48.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 0 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.91

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.09

1.42

Actual: 1.5 | Diff: +0.08

Adjusted Power Rating
44.2

Attack: 32.9, Defense: 55.9, Form: 39.4

40.3

Attack: 43.4, Defense: 40.5, Form: 34.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

1
2

16-30'

2
1

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

1

61-75'

4
2

76-90+'

4
Tromsø
Fredrikstad
Tromsø

Power Rating Breakdown

44.2

Overall

Attack 32.9
Defense 55.9
Form 39.4
Consistency 56.8
Fredrikstad

Power Rating Breakdown

40.3

Overall

Attack 43.4
Defense 40.5
Form 34.7
Consistency 44.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

50.0 vs 50.0

Opponent Quality

47.6 vs 48.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Tromsø logo Tromsø
D
KFUM (44%)
D
Aalesund (45%)
L
Bodø/Glimt (67%)
W
Molde (51%)
D
Start (38%)
L
Brann (49%)
W
Sandefjord (47%)
W
Sarpsborg (47%)
Fredrikstad logo Fredrikstad
W
Start (32%)
D
Sandefjord (52%)
W
HamKam (52%)
L
Sarpsborg (47%)
L
Brann (54%)
L
Viking (71%)
L
Kristiansund (42%)
D
Vålerenga (42%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
KFUM A
0 - 0 D
44%
Aalesund H
1 - 1 D
45%
Bodø/Glimt A
0 - 5 L
67%
Molde H
2 - 0 W
51%
Start A
1 - 1 D
38%
Brann H
0 - 5 L
49%
Sandefjord H
3 - 1 W
47%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 0 W
47%
Lillestrøm H
0 - 0 D
51%
Kristiansund H
2 - 0 W
37%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Start H
2 - 1 W
32%
Sandefjord A
1 - 1 D
52%
HamKam H
2 - 1 W
52%
Sarpsborg A
1 - 2 L
47%
Brann A
1 - 3 L
54%
Viking H
1 - 2 L
71%
Kristiansund A
0 - 2 L
42%
Vålerenga H
1 - 1 D
42%
Aalesund A
3 - 2 W
50%
KFUM H
3 - 1 W
39%

AI Analysis

This is a fascinating matchup between two evenly-matched teams. The raw numbers tell one story, but the opponent quality analysis adds crucial context.

Tromsø has faced significantly tougher opposition (SoS: 48.6) compared to Fredrikstad (SoS: 36.8). This means Tromsø's statistics carry more weight, as they were achieved against higher-caliber opponents.

Fredrikstad holds the attacking edge with 1.5 goals per match versus Tromsø's 1.0, though the gap is not insurmountable.

Tromsø has the defensive edge, conceding 1.3 per match compared to Fredrikstad's 1.6.

Tromsø has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.7 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with both teams to score being likely.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Tromsø

Tromsø

VS
Fredrikstad

Fredrikstad

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Tromsø

4W 4D 2L · 10 goals scored · 13 conceded

Fredrikstad

4W 2D 4L · 15 goals scored · 16 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or