Skip to content
Compare Udinese vs Como

Udinese vs Como Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Udinese vs Como: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Udinese Udinese Home Team
Como Como Away Team
Udinese
47.3
L D L L W W D L W D

Last 10 Matches

Como
61.5
W W W D W L L L D W

Performance Radar

Udinese
Como

Categories Won

0

Udinese

3

Draw

12

Como

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
30%

3W, 3D, 4L

50%

5W, 2D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.9

19 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.0

10 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
+2

+2

+9

+9

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

50%

5 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Atta (3 goals)
T. Douvikas (4 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 4 / 2nd Half: 8
1st Half: 8 / 2nd Half: 11
Home Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

50%

2W / 4 matches

Away Win Rate
40%

2W / 5 matches

50%

3W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
54.4

League Difficulty: 81.0, Opponent Quality: 63.0

57.9

League Difficulty: 85.5, Opponent Quality: 67.6

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.42

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.22

2.25

Actual: 1.9 | Diff: -0.35

Adjusted Power Rating
47.3

Attack: 41.8, Defense: 69.6, Form: 31.3

61.5

Attack: 68.3, Defense: 71.9, Form: 53.9

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

2
2

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4
3

46-60'

5
1

61-75'

4
3

76-90+'

3
Udinese
Como
Udinese

Power Rating Breakdown

47.3

Overall

Attack 41.8
Defense 69.6
Form 31.3
Consistency 53.2
Como

Power Rating Breakdown

61.5

Overall

Attack 68.3
Defense 71.9
Form 53.9
Consistency 45.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

81.0 vs 85.5

Opponent Quality

63.0 vs 67.6

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Udinese logo Udinese
L
Swansea (55%)
D
Istra (43%)
L
Napoli (75%)
L
Cremonese (62%)
W
Cagliari (67%)
W
Torino (66%)
D
Lazio (70%)
L
Parma (57%)
Como logo Como
W
Cremonese (67%)
W
Parma (57%)
W
Verona (69%)
D
Napoli (70%)
W
Genoa (66%)
L
Inter Milan (70%)
L
Sassuolo (80%)
L
Inter Milan (82%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Swansea A
0 - 2 L
55%
Istra H
2 - 2 D
43%
Napoli A
0 - 1 L
75%
Cremonese H
0 - 1 L
62%
Cagliari A
2 - 0 W
67%
Torino H
2 - 0 W
66%
Lazio A
3 - 3 D
70%
Parma H
0 - 1 L
57%
AC Milan A
3 - 0 W
63%
Como H
0 - 0 D
72%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Cremonese A
4 - 1 W
67%
Parma H
1 - 0 W
57%
Verona A
1 - 0 W
69%
Napoli H
0 - 0 D
70%
Genoa A
2 - 0 W
66%
Inter Milan A
2 - 3 L
70%
Sassuolo A
1 - 2 L
80%
Inter Milan H
3 - 4 L
82%
Udinese A
0 - 0 D
68%
Pisa H
5 - 0 W
47%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 54.4 vs 57.9), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

Como leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.9 goals per game compared to Udinese's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

Both defenses are comparable, with Udinese conceding 1.0 and Como conceding 1.0 per match.

Udinese has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Como has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being unlikely.

📈 Form Momentum: Como has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 14.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Como. In practical terms, Como would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

While Como holds a measurable edge in the adjusted standings, the 14.2-point differential in power ratings indicates a competitive matchup rather than a clear-cut outcome.

These two teams drew 0-0 in the Italian Serie A (2026-04-06). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Udinese

Udinese

VS
Como

Como

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Udinese

3W 3D 4L · 12 goals scored · 10 conceded

Como

5W 2D 3L · 19 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or