Skip to content
Compare Utrecht vs AZ

Utrecht vs AZ Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Utrecht vs AZ: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Utrecht Utrecht Home Team
AZ AZ Away Team
Utrecht
47.9
D L L L W L D W W W

Last 10 Matches

AZ
70.0
W W W W W W D D D D

Performance Radar

Utrecht
AZ

Categories Won

2

Utrecht

3

Draw

10

AZ

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 2D, 4L

60%

6W, 4D, 0L

Goals Scored / Match
1.4

14 / 10 matches

2.6

26 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-1

-1

+16

+16

Clean Sheet
20%

2 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
60%

6 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
A. Stepanov (3 goals)
M. Meerdink (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 2 / 2nd Half: 12
1st Half: 6 / 2nd Half: 20
Home Win Rate
50%

2W / 4 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
33%

2W / 6 matches

60%

3W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
56.9

League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.5

47.7

League Difficulty: 66.0, Opponent Quality: 60.9

Elite Opponent Record
33%

1W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 2 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.67

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.27

2.9

Actual: 2.6 | Diff: -0.3

Adjusted Power Rating
47.9

Attack: 49.9, Defense: 53.4, Form: 42.8

70.0

Attack: 84.7, Defense: 65.1, Form: 58.6

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

4
1

16-30'

1
1

31-45'

4

46-60'

6
2

61-75'

3
5

76-90+'

4
Utrecht
AZ
Utrecht

Power Rating Breakdown

47.9

Overall

Attack 49.9
Defense 53.4
Form 42.8
Consistency 44.8
AZ

Power Rating Breakdown

70.0

Overall

Attack 84.7
Defense 65.1
Form 58.6
Consistency 71.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

69.5 vs 66.0

Opponent Quality

59.5 vs 60.9

Elite Opponent Record

33% vs 0%
Utrecht logo Utrecht
D
Sparta (54%)
L
AZ (78%)
L
Groningen (59%)
L
Sevilla (48%)
W
Cambuur (32%)
L
Cambuur (32%)
D
Ajax (87%)
W
Heerenveen (62%)
AZ logo AZ
W
Fortuna (61%)
W
Utrecht (64%)
W
ADO (65%)
W
PSV (65%)
W
Olympiakos (43%)
W
Genk (43%)
D
ZW (70%)
D
NAC (56%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Sparta A
3 - 3 D
54%
AZ H
1 - 4 L
78%
Groningen A
1 - 2 L
59%
Sevilla H
0 - 1 L
48%
Cambuur A
1 - 0 W
32%
Cambuur A
0 - 1 L
32%
Ajax A
1 - 1 D
87%
Heerenveen H
3 - 2 W
62%
Fortuna H
2 - 0 W
56%
Ajax A
2 - 1 W
87%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Fortuna A
2 - 0 W
61%
Utrecht A
4 - 1 W
64%
ADO H
2 - 0 W
65%
PSV A
4 - 0 W
65%
Olympiakos H
3 - 2 W
43%
Genk H
4 - 0 W
43%
ZW A
1 - 1 D
70%
NAC H
3 - 3 D
56%
Feyenoord A
1 - 1 D
83%
Twente H
2 - 2 D
59%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

Both teams have faced similar levels of opposition (SoS: 56.9 vs 47.7), making the raw statistics a reliable comparison tool in this matchup.

AZ's attack is on another level, averaging 2.6 goals per match with M. Meerdink leading the charge (3 goals). This firepower makes them dangerous in any fixture.

AZ's backline outperforms Utrecht's, with 1.0 goals conceded per match versus 1.5.

Utrecht has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 1 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

AZ is a strong road performer with a 60% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Statistical modeling projects 3.2 goals in this fixture. The data points Over 2.5 as the value threshold, while BTTS stands at likely based on both sides' scoring records.

📈 Form Momentum: AZ has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 2.2 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 22.1-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for AZ. In practical terms, AZ would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

AZ emerges as the favorite in this matchup. With a stronger overall power rating (70.0 vs 47.9) and advantages in key areas, they should have enough to prevail.

In their recent Dutch Eredivisie match (2026-08-15), AZ prevailed 1-4 against Utrecht. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. Notably, AZ achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Utrecht shows genuine quality and mental strength. The 1-4 scoreline was emphatic — AZ completely dominated Utrecht in that encounter, raising serious questions about Utrecht's ability to compete at this level. Utrecht will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. AZ will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Utrecht

Utrecht

VS
AZ

AZ

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Utrecht

4W 2D 4L · 14 goals scored · 15 conceded

AZ

6W 4D 0L · 26 goals scored · 10 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or