Skip to content
Compare Veres Rivne vs Kharkiv

Veres Rivne vs Kharkiv Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Veres Rivne vs Kharkiv: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Veres Rivne Veres Rivne Home Team
Kharkiv Kharkiv Away Team
Veres Rivne
30.5
L L D D L L L D D L

Last 10 Matches

Kharkiv
38.5
L L D L W D D D L D

Performance Radar

Veres Rivne
Kharkiv

Categories Won

1

Veres Rivne

5

Draw

9

Kharkiv

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
0%

0W, 4D, 6L

10%

1W, 5D, 4L

Goals Scored / Match
0.7

7 / 10 matches

1.0

10 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.9

19 / 10 matches

1.4

14 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-12

-12

-4

-4

Clean Sheet
10%

1 / 10 matches

10%

1 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
30%

3 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
50%

5 / 10 matches

60%

6 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
V. Boiko (1 goals)
P. Itodo (3 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 0 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 7
Home Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

0%

0W / 5 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 5 matches

20%

1W / 5 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
52.6

League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 62.4

52.1

League Difficulty: 76.8, Opponent Quality: 61.0

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 3 matches

0%

0W / 4 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.78

Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.08

1.21

Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.21

Adjusted Power Rating
30.5

Attack: 23.9, Defense: 37.6, Form: 0.0

38.5

Attack: 34.0, Defense: 54.5, Form: 10.2

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1

16-30'

1

31-45'

1
2

46-60'

1

61-75'

3
1

76-90+'

Veres Rivne
Kharkiv
Veres Rivne

Power Rating Breakdown

30.5

Overall

Attack 23.9
Defense 37.6
Form 0.0
Consistency 92.8
Kharkiv

Power Rating Breakdown

38.5

Overall

Attack 34.0
Defense 54.5
Form 10.2
Consistency 77.2

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

76.8 vs 76.8

Opponent Quality

62.4 vs 61.0

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Veres Rivne logo Veres Rivne
L
Karpaty Lviv (62%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (62%)
D
Nyva Ternopil (45%)
D
Polissya (45%)
L
Kharkiv (60%)
L
Karpaty Lviv (83%)
L
Kryvbas KR (72%)
D
Rukh Lviv (53%)
Kharkiv logo Kharkiv
L
Schalke 04 (53%)
L
Fagiano (39%)
D
Hradec Kr. (60%)
L
Jablonec (39%)
W
Veres Rivne (56%)
D
Epitsentr (67%)
D
Karpaty Lviv (78%)
D
Zorya (75%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 1 L
62%
Karpaty Lviv A
1 - 5 L
62%
Nyva Ternopil H
1 - 1 D
45%
Polissya H
1 - 1 D
45%
Kharkiv H
0 - 1 L
60%
Karpaty Lviv A
0 - 2 L
83%
Kryvbas KR H
1 - 3 L
72%
Rukh Lviv A
0 - 0 D
53%
Epitsentr H
3 - 3 D
67%
Zorya A
0 - 2 L
75%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Schalke 04 H
0 - 2 L
53%
Fagiano H
1 - 2 L
39%
Hradec Kr. A
3 - 3 D
60%
Jablonec A
0 - 1 L
39%
Veres Rivne A
1 - 0 W
56%
Epitsentr H
1 - 1 D
67%
Karpaty Lviv H
2 - 2 D
78%
Zorya A
1 - 1 D
75%
Polissya H
0 - 1 L
73%
LNZ Cherkasy A
1 - 1 D
70%

AI Analysis

A statistical edge is evident here, but the trailing side carries enough threat to keep this competitive. Once opponent quality is accounted for, the differential softens somewhat without fundamentally altering the overall outlook.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 52.6 vs 52.1), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Kharkiv holds the attacking edge with 1.0 goals per match versus Veres Rivne's 0.7, though the gap isn't insurmountable.

Kharkiv's backline outperforms Veres Rivne's, with 1.4 goals conceded per match versus 1.9.

Veres Rivne has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 3 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Kharkiv has struggled against elite opposition, winning only 0 of 4 matches. When the stakes are highest, their performance drops significantly.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.5 total goals. Under 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

❄️ Form Momentum: Veres Rivne is struggling for form, winning just 0 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

❄️ Form Momentum: Kharkiv is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Kharkiv faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.4 goals per match. If Veres Rivne can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.

💡 Why This Matters: The 8.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 70% win probability for Kharkiv. In practical terms, Kharkiv would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.

The numbers lean toward Kharkiv, with a 8.0-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.

In the Ukraine Premier League (2026-05-24), Kharkiv beat Veres Rivne 0-1. League results are the most consistent indicator of form, and this result speaks volumes about the current dynamic between these teams. Notably, Kharkiv achieved this result away from home, which is particularly impressive. Winning on the road against Veres Rivne shows genuine quality and mental strength. The narrow 0-1 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Veres Rivne will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Kharkiv will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Veres Rivne

Veres Rivne

VS
Kharkiv

Kharkiv

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Veres Rivne

0W 4D 6L · 7 goals scored · 19 conceded

Kharkiv

1W 5D 4L · 10 goals scored · 14 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or