Viborg vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Viborg vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Viborg
Home Team
AGF
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Viborg
Draw
AGF
Statistical Comparison
4W, 1D, 5L
4W, 4D, 2L
12 / 10 matches
17 / 10 matches
15 / 10 matches
12 / 10 matches
-3
+5
4 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
3W / 7 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 3 matches
League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.2
League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 52.9
0W / 1 matches
0W / 1 matches
Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.05
Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.01
Attack: 35.8, Defense: 44.8, Form: 35.8
Attack: 52.0, Defense: 55.1, Form: 36.7
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Viborg
AGF
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.
With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.5 vs 41.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.
AGF leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Viborg's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Viborg's 1.5.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
📈 Form Momentum: AGF has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
💡 Why This Matters: The 10.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for AGF. In practical terms, AGF would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
AGF has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.
In their recent Danish Superligaen match (2026-05-17), AGF prevailed 6-2 against Viborg. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. AGF secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-2 scoreline was emphatic — AGF completely dominated Viborg in that encounter, raising serious questions about Viborg's ability to compete at this level. Viborg will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. AGF will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Viborg
AGF
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Viborg
4W 1D 5L · 12 goals scored · 15 conceded
AGF
4W 4D 2L · 17 goals scored · 12 conceded
Popular Teams