Skip to content
Compare Viborg vs AGF

Viborg vs AGF Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Viborg vs AGF: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Viborg Viborg Home Team
AGF AGF Away Team
Viborg
38.6
W W L L L D W L L W

Last 10 Matches

AGF
48.9
D L W W W W D D L D

Performance Radar

Viborg
AGF

Categories Won

2

Viborg

5

Draw

8

AGF

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
40%

4W, 1D, 5L

40%

4W, 4D, 2L

Goals Scored / Match
1.2

12 / 10 matches

1.7

17 / 10 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
1.5

15 / 10 matches

1.2

12 / 10 matches

Goal Difference
-3

-3

+5

+5

Clean Sheet
40%

4 / 10 matches

30%

3 / 10 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
40%

4 / 10 matches

40%

4 / 10 matches

Both Teams to Score
40%

4 / 10 matches

70%

7 / 10 matches

Top Scorer
T. Jørgensen (2 goals)
T. Kristjánsson (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 5 / 2nd Half: 7
1st Half: 7 / 2nd Half: 10
Home Win Rate
60%

3W / 5 matches

43%

3W / 7 matches

Away Win Rate
20%

1W / 5 matches

33%

1W / 3 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
39.5

League Difficulty: 53.0, Opponent Quality: 52.2

41.8

League Difficulty: 58.2, Opponent Quality: 52.9

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 1 matches

0%

0W / 1 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
1.25

Actual: 1.2 | Diff: -0.05

1.71

Actual: 1.7 | Diff: -0.01

Adjusted Power Rating
38.6

Attack: 35.8, Defense: 44.8, Form: 35.8

48.9

Attack: 52.0, Defense: 55.1, Form: 36.7

Goal Timing Analysis

1

0-15'

2
1

16-30'

3
3

31-45'

2
2

46-60'

2

61-75'

1
3

76-90+'

5
Viborg
AGF
Viborg

Power Rating Breakdown

38.6

Overall

Attack 35.8
Defense 44.8
Form 35.8
Consistency 39.7
AGF

Power Rating Breakdown

48.9

Overall

Attack 52.0
Defense 55.1
Form 36.7
Consistency 56.8

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

53.0 vs 58.2

Opponent Quality

52.2 vs 52.9

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Viborg logo Viborg
W
OB (42%)
W
Aarhus Fremad (46%)
L
Copenhagen (75%)
L
AGF (61%)
L
Sønderjyske (40%)
D
Midtjylland (62%)
W
Nordsjælland (50%)
L
Brøndby (46%)
AGF logo AGF
D
Brøndby (46%)
L
Lech (81%)
W
Horsens (40%)
W
Viborg (46%)
W
Brøndby (51%)
W
Sønderjyske (40%)
D
Midtjylland (58%)
D
Nordsjælland (55%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
OB H
1 - 0 W
42%
Aarhus Fremad H
1 - 0 W
46%
Copenhagen A
1 - 2 L
75%
AGF A
2 - 6 L
61%
Sønderjyske H
0 - 1 L
40%
Midtjylland A
3 - 3 D
62%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 0 W
50%
Brøndby H
0 - 1 L
46%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 2 L
55%
Sønderjyske A
2 - 0 W
45%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Brøndby H
1 - 1 D
46%
Lech H
1 - 4 L
81%
Horsens H
2 - 0 W
40%
Viborg H
6 - 2 W
46%
Brøndby A
2 - 0 W
51%
Sønderjyske H
2 - 1 W
40%
Midtjylland H
0 - 0 D
58%
Nordsjælland A
1 - 1 D
55%
Midtjylland A
1 - 2 L
62%
Nordsjælland H
1 - 1 D
50%

AI Analysis

The statistics point to a clear direction in this matchup, though the underdog should not be underestimated. When we factor in the quality of opponents each team has faced, the gap narrows slightly but the overall picture remains consistent.

With comparable strength of schedule figures (39.5 vs 41.8), the opposition quality faced by both sides has been largely equivalent, giving these head-to-head stats greater analytical validity.

AGF leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.7 goals per game compared to Viborg's 1.2 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.

AGF has the defensive edge, conceding 1.2 per match compared to Viborg's 1.5.

Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.

📈 Form Momentum: AGF has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.6 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

💡 Why This Matters: The 10.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 76% win probability for AGF. In practical terms, AGF would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

AGF has the edge based on adjusted metrics, but this is far from a foregone conclusion. The 10.3-point power gap suggests an advantage without guaranteeing victory.

In their recent Danish Superligaen match (2026-05-17), AGF prevailed 6-2 against Viborg. This result provides valuable insight into how these teams match up against each other. AGF secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The 6-2 scoreline was emphatic — AGF completely dominated Viborg in that encounter, raising serious questions about Viborg's ability to compete at this level. Viborg will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. AGF will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Viborg

Viborg

VS
AGF

AGF

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Viborg

4W 1D 5L · 12 goals scored · 15 conceded

AGF

4W 4D 2L · 17 goals scored · 12 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or