Skip to content
Compare Vietnam vs Chinese Taipei

Vietnam vs Chinese Taipei Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison

Compare Vietnam vs Chinese Taipei: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.

Vietnam Vietnam Home Team
Chinese Taipei Chinese Taipei Away Team
Vietnam
24.5
L L W L L L W

Last 10 Matches

Chinese Taipei
56.7
L L W W L W W W

Performance Radar

Vietnam
Chinese Taipei

Categories Won

3

Vietnam

3

Draw

9

Chinese Taipei

Statistical Comparison

Win Percentage
29%

2W, 0D, 5L

62%

5W, 0D, 3L

Goals Scored / Match
0.9

6 / 7 matches

1.4

11 / 8 matches

Goals Conceded / Match
2.9

20 / 7 matches

1.1

9 / 8 matches

Goal Difference
-14

-14

+2

+2

Clean Sheet
14%

1 / 7 matches

50%

4 / 8 matches

Over 2.5 Goals
57%

4 / 7 matches

38%

3 / 8 matches

Both Teams to Score
43%

3 / 7 matches

12%

1 / 8 matches

Top Scorer
Ngân Thị Vạn Sự (2 goals)
Su Yu-hsuan (2 goals)
Most Goals by Half
1st Half: 1 / 2nd Half: 5
1st Half: 3 / 2nd Half: 8
Home Win Rate
67%

2W / 3 matches

50%

1W / 2 matches

Away Win Rate
0%

0W / 4 matches

67%

4W / 6 matches

Schedule Strength (SoS)
45.7

League Difficulty: 65.0, Opponent Quality: 56.4

55.7

League Difficulty: 58.1, Opponent Quality: 54.1

Elite Opponent Record
0%

0W / 2 matches

0%

0W / 0 matches

Expected Goals (xG)
0.83

Actual: 0.9 | Diff: +0.03

1.34

Actual: 1.4 | Diff: +0.04

Adjusted Power Rating
24.5

Attack: 28.7, Defense: 3.2, Form: 27.8

56.7

Attack: 49.3, Defense: 66.9, Form: 65.5

Goal Timing Analysis

0-15'

1
1

16-30'

1

31-45'

46-60'

1

61-75'

1

76-90+'

1
Vietnam
Chinese Taipei
Vietnam

Power Rating Breakdown

24.5

Overall

Attack 28.7
Defense 3.2
Form 27.8
Consistency 44.9
Chinese Taipei

Power Rating Breakdown

56.7

Overall

Attack 49.3
Defense 66.9
Form 65.5
Consistency 36.7

Strength of Schedule

Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.

League Difficulty

65.0 vs 58.1

Opponent Quality

56.4 vs 54.1

Elite Opponent Record

0% vs 0%
Vietnam logo Vietnam
L
Japan (68%)
L
Chinese Taipei (54%)
W
India (27%)
L
China (70%)
L
China (70%)
L
Uzbekistan (53%)
W
Uzbekistan (53%)
Chinese Taipei logo Chinese Taipei
L
Korea DPR (55%)
L
China (56%)
W
India (31%)
W
Vietnam (33%)
L
Japan (68%)
W
Nepal (64%)
W
Indonesia (64%)
W
Philippines (62%)

Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.

Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Japan A
0 - 4 L
68%
Chinese Taipei A
0 - 1 L
54%
India H
2 - 1 W
27%
China A
1 - 6 L
70%
China A
0 - 2 L
70%
Uzbekistan H
2 - 6 L
53%
Uzbekistan H
1 - 0 W
53%
Opponent Breakdown
Opponent Breakdown
Score
Opp. Quality
Korea DPR H
0 - 4 L
55%
China A
0 - 2 L
56%
India A
3 - 1 W
31%
Vietnam H
1 - 0 W
33%
Japan A
0 - 2 L
68%
Nepal A
1 - 0 W
64%
Indonesia A
5 - 0 W
64%
Philippines A
1 - 0 W
62%

AI Analysis

Surface-level numbers suggest a competitive matchup, but the Strength of Schedule correction tells a different story. The favorite has earned their metrics against stiffer competition, exposing a meaningful performance gap between these two sides.

The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 45.7 vs 55.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.

Offensively, Chinese Taipei outperforms Vietnam with 1.4 goals per match to 0.9, though the margin leaves the contest genuinely open.

Chinese Taipei holds a clear defensive edge, limiting opponents to just 1.1 goals per game and recording 4 clean sheets, compared to Vietnam's leaky backline that surrenders 2.9 goals per match.

Chinese Taipei has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.

Chinese Taipei is a strong road performer with a 67% away win rate, proving they can deliver results regardless of venue.

Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 3.1 total goals. Going Over 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.

❄️ Form Momentum: Vietnam is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 7 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.

📈 Form Momentum: Chinese Taipei has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.88 points per game over their last 8 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.

📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Chinese Taipei is on the rise with 5W in last 8, while Vietnam shows signs of decline with 2W in last 7.

💡 Why This Matters: The 32.2-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Chinese Taipei. In practical terms, Chinese Taipei would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.

Accounting for opponent quality throughout our evaluation, Chinese Taipei emerges as the heavy favorite by every measurable indicator. A power rating of 56.7 compared to 24.5, combined with across-the-board statistical superiority, projects Chinese Taipei as the likely winner and by a comfortable margin.

In the AFC Women's Asian Cup (2026-03-07), Chinese Taipei eliminated Vietnam with a 1-0 result. Cup matches bring a unique intensity, and Chinese Taipei showed they can handle the pressure. Chinese Taipei secured this victory at home, where they tend to be strongest. However, the next encounter could present a different challenge if the venue changes. The narrow 1-0 result shows how tight these encounters are. A single moment of quality or a tactical tweak could swing the next meeting either way. Vietnam will be eager to avenge this defeat. The desire for revenge can be a powerful motivator, and they may come into the next meeting with extra determination. Chinese Taipei will carry a psychological advantage from this recent victory. Knowing you've beaten your opponent recently provides a significant confidence boost.

Match Simulator

AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics

Vietnam

Vietnam

VS
Chinese Taipei

Chinese Taipei

In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.

Compare Another Pair

Comparison Summary

This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.

Vietnam

2W 0D 5L · 6 goals scored · 20 conceded

Chinese Taipei

5W 0D 3L · 11 goals scored · 9 conceded

Popular Teams

We use cookies & local storage to enhance your experience. Learn more

Login / Register

5 + 2 = ?
or