Plzeň vs Panathinaikos Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Plzeň vs Panathinaikos: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Plzeň
Home Team
Panathinaikos
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Plzeň
Draw
Panathinaikos
Statistical Comparison
5W, 2D, 3L
2W, 4D, 4L
14 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
8 / 10 matches
13 / 10 matches
+6
-6
6 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
2 / 10 matches
4 / 10 matches
3W / 5 matches
0W / 4 matches
2W / 5 matches
2W / 6 matches
League Difficulty: 56.7, Opponent Quality: 55.1
League Difficulty: 61.1, Opponent Quality: 59.3
0W / 0 matches
1W / 2 matches
Actual: 1.4 | Diff: -0.05
Actual: 0.7 | Diff: -0.15
Attack: 49.3, Defense: 77.5, Form: 52.8
Attack: 25.1, Defense: 61.0, Form: 21.5
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Plzeň
Panathinaikos
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
When we look at the raw statistics, both teams appear to be in form, but applying the Strength of Schedule adjustment reveals a significant quality gap. The favorite has been tested against tougher opposition and has consistently delivered.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 55.7 vs 57.7), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
Plzeň leads the attacking statistics, averaging 1.4 goals per game compared to Panathinaikos's 0.7 — a meaningful but far from decisive advantage.
Plzeň's backline outperforms Panathinaikos's, with 0.8 goals conceded per match versus 1.3.
Plzeň has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Crunching the numbers, this match averages out to 2.1 total goals. Going Under 2.5 carries the stronger statistical case, with the BTTS market looking unlikely given current form.
📈 Form Momentum: Plzeň has been remarkably consistent, maintaining a steady 1.7 points per game over their last 10 matches. This stability makes them a predictable but reliable force.
❄️ Form Momentum: Panathinaikos is struggling for form, winning just 2 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
📊 Key Trend: The form trajectories are diverging. Plzeň is on the rise with 5W in last 10, while Panathinaikos shows signs of decline with 2W in last 10.
💡 Why This Matters: The 18.0-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 85% win probability for Plzeň. In practical terms, Plzeň would win 8 out of 10 such matchups.
Based on the available data, Plzeň holds the stronger position heading into this matchup. A power rating of 56.9 against 38.9 underlines their overall quality advantage and makes them the logical pick to come out on top.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Plzeň
Panathinaikos
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Plzeň
5W 2D 3L · 14 goals scored · 8 conceded
Panathinaikos
2W 4D 4L · 7 goals scored · 13 conceded
Popular Teams