Volos vs Groningen Head-to-Head Stats and Form Comparison
Compare Volos vs Groningen: head-to-head stats, recent form, goals, defensive record and strength indicators from last matches.
Volos
Home Team
Groningen
Away Team
Compare...
Performance Radar
Categories Won
Volos
Draw
Groningen
Statistical Comparison
1W, 3D, 6L
3W, 2D, 5L
10 / 10 matches
10 / 10 matches
21 / 10 matches
16 / 10 matches
-11
-6
1 / 10 matches
3 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
6 / 10 matches
7 / 10 matches
5 / 10 matches
1W / 5 matches
1W / 6 matches
0W / 5 matches
2W / 4 matches
League Difficulty: 54.9, Opponent Quality: 50.8
League Difficulty: 69.5, Opponent Quality: 59.9
0W / 0 matches
2W / 4 matches
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: +0.12
Actual: 1.0 | Diff: -0.12
Attack: 34.1, Defense: 30.7, Form: 10.2
Attack: 37.1, Defense: 51.9, Form: 33.4
Goal Timing Analysis
0-15'
16-30'
31-45'
46-60'
61-75'
76-90+'
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Power Rating Breakdown
Overall
Strength of Schedule
Measures the difficulty of opponents faced. Higher = tougher schedule.
League Difficulty
Opponent Quality
Elite Opponent Record
Volos
Groningen
Opponent Quality: Quality blends league strength, recent points form, goal difference, and home/away context. It is not only club size or reputation.
AI Analysis
While the data leans decisively toward one side, dismissing the underdog would be premature. Adjusting for strength of schedule brings the margins closer together, yet the broader trend holds firm throughout the analysis.
The level of competition each team has encountered is broadly aligned (SoS: 52.4 vs 61.3), which adds credibility to any direct statistical comparisons drawn between these two sides.
The attacking output of Volos and Groningen is virtually identical, with both sides posting averages of 1.0 and 1.0 goals per game respectively.
Groningen has the defensive edge, conceding 1.6 per match compared to Volos's 2.1.
Volos has not faced any elite-level opponents in their recent matches, making it difficult to assess their ceiling.
Groningen has proven their mettle against elite opponents, winning 2 of 4 matches against top-tier teams. This is a crucial indicator of their ability to perform under pressure.
Based on the combined statistics, expect 2.8 total goals. Over 2.5 goals is the statistical lean, with BTTS (Both Teams to Score) being likely.
❄️ Form Momentum: Volos is struggling for form, winning just 1 of their last 10 matches. Teams in this state often lack the confidence to compete in tight moments.
⚠️ Risk Factor: Despite being the statistical favorite, Groningen faces a key vulnerability: their defense concedes 1.6 goals per match. If Volos can exploit this, an upset becomes plausible.
💡 Why This Matters: The 9.3-point power rating gap between these teams translates to approximately a 73% win probability for Groningen. In practical terms, Groningen would win 7 out of 10 such matchups.
The numbers lean toward Groningen, with a 9.3-point power rating gap pointing to a genuine advantage — though not one that makes this contest a formality.
These two teams drew 0-0 in the Club Friendlies (2026-07-25). The stalemate suggests these sides are closely matched, and another tight contest could be on the cards. With the previous match ending in a draw, neither side holds a psychological edge. Both teams will feel they have a genuine chance of winning.
Match Simulator
AI-powered match simulation based on real statistics
Volos
Groningen
In H2H (head-to-head) matchups, to eliminate momentary fluctuations and coincidences, we limit our analyses to an optimal depth of exactly 10 matches. Neither less, nor more. This focused approach is our undisputed gold standard, revealing the tactical and psychological supremacy teams hold over each other in its purest form. We do not dwell on the noise of the past; we concentrate on the millimetric precision of current form.
Comparison Summary
This head-to-head comparison analyzes the last 10 matches of each team, evaluating attack power, defensive strength, form consistency, and overall performance metrics. The power ratings are calculated using a weighted algorithm that considers goals scored, goals conceded, win rate, and recent form trends.
Volos
1W 3D 6L · 10 goals scored · 21 conceded
Groningen
3W 2D 5L · 10 goals scored · 16 conceded
Popular Teams